08.01.2017 Views

3e2a1b56-dafb-454d-87ad-86adea3e7b86

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

498<br />

Part Three<br />

Planning and control<br />

There are many<br />

definitions of quality<br />

The operation’s view of quality<br />

There are many definitions of quality; here we define it as ‘consistent conformance to customers’<br />

expectations’.<br />

The use of the word ‘conformance’ implies that there is a need to meet a clear specification.<br />

Ensuring a product or service conforms to specification is a key operations task. ‘Consistent’<br />

implies that conformance to specification is not an ad hoc event but that the product or<br />

service meets the specification because quality requirements are used to design and run the<br />

processes that produce products and services. The use of ‘customers’ expectations’ recognizes<br />

that the product or service must take the views of customers into account, which may be<br />

influenced by price. Also note the use of the word ‘expectations’ in this definition, rather<br />

than ‘needs’ or ‘wants’.<br />

Customers’ view of quality<br />

Past experiences, individual knowledge and history will all shape customers’ expectations.<br />

Furthermore, customers may each perceive a product or service in different ways. One person<br />

may perceive a long-haul flight as an exciting part of a holiday; the person on the next seat may<br />

see it as a necessary chore to get to a business meeting. So quality needs to be understood<br />

from a customer’s point of view because, to the customer, the quality of a particular product<br />

or service is whatever he or she perceives it to be. If the passengers on a skiing charter flight<br />

perceive it to be of good quality, despite long queues at check-in or cramped seating and poor<br />

meals, then the flight really is of good perceived quality. 3 Also customers may be unable to<br />

judge the ‘technical’ specification of the service or product and so use surrogate measures<br />

as a basis for their perception of quality. 4 For example, a customer may find it difficult to<br />

judge the technical quality of dental treatment, except insofar as it does not give any more<br />

trouble. The customer may therefore perceive quality in terms the attire and demeanour of<br />

the dentist and technician, décor of the surgery, and how they were treated.<br />

Reconciling the operation’s and the customer’s views of quality<br />

Customer expectations<br />

Customer perception<br />

The operation’s view of quality is concerned with trying to meet customer expectations.<br />

The customer’s view of quality is what he or she perceives the product or service to be. To<br />

create a unified view, quality can be defined as the degree of fit between customers’ expectations<br />

and customer perception of the product or service. 5 Using this idea allows us to see<br />

the customers’ view of quality of (and, therefore, satisfaction with) the product or service<br />

as the result of the customers comparing their expectations of the product or service with<br />

Figure 17.3 Perceived quality is governed by the magnitude and direction of the gap<br />

between customers’ expectations and their perceptions of the product or service

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!