08.01.2017 Views

3e2a1b56-dafb-454d-87ad-86adea3e7b86

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

350<br />

Part Three<br />

Planning and control<br />

Table 12.1 Costs of adoption of plans with different order quantities<br />

Demand (D) = 1,000 units per year<br />

Order costs (C o ) = £20 per order<br />

Holding costs (C h ) = £1 per item per year<br />

Order quantity Holding costs + Order costs = Total costs<br />

(Q) (0.5Q × C h ) ((D/Q) × C o )<br />

50 25 20 × 20 = 400 425<br />

100 50 10 × 20 = 200 250<br />

150 75 6.7 × 20 = 134 209<br />

200 100 5 × 20 = 100 200*<br />

250 125 4 × 20 = 80 205<br />

300 150 3.3 × 20 = 66 216<br />

350 175 2.9 × 20 = 58 233<br />

400 200 2.5 × 20 = 50 250<br />

*Minimum total cost.<br />

We can now calculate the costs of adopting plans with different order quantities. These are<br />

illustrated in Table 12.1. As we would expect with low values of Q, holding costs are low but<br />

the costs of placing orders are high because orders have to be placed very frequently. As Q<br />

increases, the holding costs increase but the costs of placing orders decrease. Initially the<br />

decrease in ordering costs is greater than the increase in holding costs and the total cost falls.<br />

After a point, however, the decrease in ordering costs slows, whereas the increase in holding<br />

costs remains constant and the total cost starts to increase. In this case the order quantity, Q,<br />

which minimizes the sum of holding and order costs, is 200. This ‘optimum’ order quantity<br />

is called the economic order quantity (EOQ). This is illustrated graphically in Figure 12.7.<br />

Figure 12.7 Graphical representation of the economic order quantity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!