08.01.2017 Views

3e2a1b56-dafb-454d-87ad-86adea3e7b86

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

432<br />

Part Three<br />

Planning and control<br />

Table 15.1 Inventories of materials, information or customers have similar characteristics<br />

Inventory<br />

Of material<br />

(queue of material)<br />

Of information<br />

(queue of information)<br />

Less current information<br />

and so worth less<br />

Needs memory capacity<br />

Defects hidden, possible<br />

data corruption<br />

Makes stages<br />

independent<br />

Of customers<br />

(queue of people)<br />

Wastes customers’ time<br />

Cost<br />

Ties up working capital<br />

Space<br />

Needs storage space<br />

Defects hidden, possible<br />

damage<br />

Makes stages independent<br />

Needs waiting area<br />

Gives negative<br />

perception<br />

Promotes job<br />

specialization /<br />

fragmentation<br />

Servers kept busy by<br />

waiting customers<br />

Avoids having to match<br />

supply and demand<br />

Quality<br />

De-coupling<br />

Utilization<br />

Stages kept busy by<br />

work-in-progress<br />

Stages kept busy by<br />

work in data queues<br />

Avoids need for<br />

straight-through<br />

processing<br />

Coordination<br />

Avoids need for<br />

synchronization<br />

Source: Adapted from Fitzsimmons, J.A. (1990) Making continual improvement: a competitive strategy for service<br />

firms, in Bowen, D.E., Chase, R.B., Cummings, T.G. and Associates (eds) Service Management Effectiveness,<br />

Jossey-Bass.<br />

Here items are processed and then passed directly to the next stage ‘just-in-time’ for them to<br />

be processed further. Problems at any stage have a very different effect in such a system. Now<br />

if stage A stops processing, stage B will notice immediately and stage C very soon after. Stage<br />

A’s problem is now quickly exposed to the whole process, which is immediately affected by<br />

the problem. This means that the responsibility for solving the problem is no longer confined<br />

to the staff at stage A. It is now shared by everyone, considerably improving the chances<br />

of the problem being solved, if only because it is now too important to be ignored. In other<br />

words, by preventing items accumulating between stages, the operation has increased the<br />

chances of the intrinsic efficiency of the plant being improved.<br />

Non-synchronized approaches seek to encourage efficiency by protecting each part of the<br />

process from disruption. The lean synchronized approach takes the opposite view. Exposure<br />

of the system (although not suddenly, as in our simplified example) to problems can both<br />

make them more evident and change the ‘motivation structure’ of the whole system towards<br />

solving the problems. Lean synchronization sees accumulations of inventory as a ‘blanket<br />

of obscurity’ that lies over the production system and prevents problems being noticed.<br />

This same argument can be applied when, instead of queues of material, or information<br />

(inventory), an operation has to deal with queues of customers. Table 15.1 shows how certain<br />

aspects of inventory are analogous to certain aspects of queues.<br />

The river and rocks analogy<br />

The idea of obscuring effects of inventory is often illustrated diagrammatically, as in<br />

Figure 15.3. The many problems of the operation are shown as rocks in a river bed that<br />

cannot be seen because of the depth of the water. The water in this analogy represents the<br />

inventory in the operation. Yet, even though the rocks cannot be seen, they slow the progress<br />

of the river’s flow and cause turbulence. Gradually reducing the depth of the water<br />

(inventory) exposes the worst of the problems which can be resolved, after which the water<br />

is lowered further, exposing more problems, and so on. The same argument will also apply<br />

for the flow between whole processes, or whole operations. For example, stages A, B and C<br />

in Figure 15.2 could be a supplier operation, a manufacturer and a customer’s operation,<br />

respectively.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!