08.01.2017 Views

3e2a1b56-dafb-454d-87ad-86adea3e7b86

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 19 Risk management 595<br />

Figure 19.11 The stages in failure planning<br />

later) but it is often necessary to know something of the causes of failure in case it is necessary<br />

to determine what action to take.<br />

Act. The discover stage could only take minutes or even seconds, depending on the severity<br />

of the failure. If the failure is a severe one with important consequences, we need to move on<br />

to doing something about it quickly. This means carrying out three actions, the first two of<br />

which could be carried out in reverse order, depending on the urgency of the situation. First,<br />

tell the significant people involved what you are proposing to do about the failure. In service<br />

operations this is especially important where the customers need to be kept informed, both<br />

for their peace of mind and to demonstrate that something is being done. In all operations,<br />

however, it is important to communicate what action is going to happen so that everyone can<br />

set their own recovery plans in motion. Second, the effects of the failure need to be contained<br />

in order to stop the consequences spreading and causing further failures. The precise containment<br />

actions will depend on the nature of the failure. Third, there needs to be some kind<br />

of follow-up to make sure that the containment actions really have contained the failure.<br />

Learn. As discussed earlier in this chapter, the benefits of failure in providing learning opportunities<br />

should not be underestimated. In failure planning, learning involves revisiting the<br />

failure to find out its root cause and then engineering out the causes of the failure so that it<br />

will not happen again. This is the key stage for much failure planning.<br />

Plan. Learning the lessons from a failure is not the end of the procedure. Operations<br />

managers need formally to incorporate the lessons into their future reactions to failures. This<br />

is often done by working through ‘in theory’ how they would react to failures in the future.<br />

Specifically, this involves first identifying all the possible failures which might occur (in a<br />

similar way to the FMEA approach). Second, it means formally defining the procedures<br />

which the organization should follow in the case of each type of identified failure.<br />

Business continuity<br />

Business continuity<br />

Many of the ideas behind failure, failure prevention and recovery are incorporated in the<br />

growing field of business continuity. This aims to help operations avoid and recover from<br />

disasters while keeping the business going, an issue that has risen to near the top of many<br />

firms’ agenda since 11 September 2001. As operations become increasingly integrated (and<br />

increasingly dependent on integrated technologies such as information technologies), critical<br />

failures can result from a series of related and unrelated events and combine to disrupt totally<br />

a company’s business. These events are the critical malfunctions which have the potential to<br />

interrupt normal business activity and even stop the entire company, such as natural disasters,<br />

fire, power or telecommunications failure, corporate crime, theft, fraud, sabotage, computer<br />

system failure, bomb blast, scare or other security alert, key personnel leaving, becoming ill<br />

or dying, key suppliers ceasing trading, contamination of product or processes, and so on.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!