08.01.2017 Views

3e2a1b56-dafb-454d-87ad-86adea3e7b86

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

458<br />

Part Three<br />

Planning and control<br />

Operations in practice The Millau bridge 1<br />

For decades French motorists called the little bridge at<br />

Millau ‘the Millau cork’. It held up all the traffic on what<br />

should have been one of the busiest north–south routes<br />

through France. No longer. In place of the little bridge is<br />

one of the most impressive and beautiful civil engineering<br />

successes of the last century. Lord Foster, the bridge’s<br />

architect, described it as having the ‘delicacy of a<br />

butterfly’, with the environment dominating the scene<br />

rather than the bridge. And although the bridge appears<br />

to float on the clouds, it is also a remarkable technical<br />

achievement. At 300 metres it is the highest road bridge<br />

in the world, weighing 36,000 tonnes. The central pillar is<br />

higher than the Eiffel Tower, and took only three years<br />

to complete, notwithstanding the new engineering<br />

techniques that were needed.<br />

Outline plans for the bridge were produced back in<br />

1987, but construction did not begin until December<br />

2001. It was completed in December 2004, on time<br />

and budget, having proved the effectiveness of its<br />

new construction technique. The traditional method of<br />

building this type of bridge (called a ‘cable stay bridge’)<br />

involves building sections of the roadway on the ground<br />

and using cranes to put them in position. Because of<br />

its height, 300 metres above the valley floor, a new<br />

technique had to be developed. First, the towers were<br />

built in the usual way, with steel-reinforced concrete.<br />

The roadway was built on the high ground at either side<br />

of the valley and then pushed forward into space as<br />

further sections were added, until it met with precision<br />

(to the nearest centimetre) in the centre. This technique<br />

had never been tried before and it carried engineering<br />

risks, which added to the complexity of the project<br />

management task.<br />

It all began with a massive recruitment drive. ‘People<br />

came from all over France for employment. We knew it<br />

would be a long job. We housed them in apartments and<br />

houses in and around Millau. Guarantees were given to<br />

all the tenants and a unit was set up to help everyone<br />

with the paperwork involved in this. It was not unusual<br />

for a worker to be recruited in the morning and have<br />

his apartment available the same evening with electricity<br />

and a telephone available’ (Jean-Pierre Martin, Chief<br />

Engineer of Groupe Eiffage and director of building).<br />

Over 3,000 workers contributed to the project, with 500<br />

of them on the project site, working in all weathers to<br />

complete the project on time. ‘Every day I would ask<br />

myself what was the intense force that united these men’,<br />

said Jean-Pierre Martin. ‘They had a very strong sense of<br />

pride and they belonged to a community that was to build<br />

the most beautiful construction in the world. It was never<br />

necessary to shout at them to get them to work. Life on a<br />

construction site has many ups and downs. Some days<br />

we were frozen. Other days we were subjected to a heat<br />

wave. But even on days of bad weather, one had to force<br />

them to stay indoors. Yet often they would leave their<br />

lodgings to return to work.’<br />

Many different businesses were involved in building<br />

the bridge. All of them needed coordinating in such a<br />

way that they would cooperate towards the common<br />

goal, but yet avoid any loss of overall responsibility.<br />

Jean-Pierre Martin came up with the idea of<br />

9 autonomous work groups. One group was placed at<br />

the foot of each of the 7 piles that would support the<br />

bridge and two others at either end. The motto adopted<br />

by the teams was ‘rigueur et convivialité’, rigorous quality<br />

and friendly cooperation. ‘The difficulty with this type of<br />

project is keeping everyone enthusiastic throughout its<br />

duration. To make this easier we created these small<br />

groups. Each of the 9 teams’ shifts were organized in<br />

relays between 7 and 14 hours, and 14 and 21 hours.’<br />

So, to maintain the good atmosphere, no expense was<br />

spared to celebrate important events in the construction<br />

of the viaduct, for example, a pile or another piece of<br />

road completed. Sometimes, to boost the morale of<br />

the teams, and to celebrate these important events<br />

Jean-Pierre would organize a ‘méchouis’ – a spit roast<br />

of lamb, especially popular with the many workers who<br />

were of North African origin.<br />

Source: Jean-Philippe Arles/Reuters/Corbis

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!