Dialogue in and between Different Cultures - International ...
Dialogue in and between Different Cultures - International ...
Dialogue in and between Different Cultures - International ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Politeness <strong>and</strong> Social Dynamics <strong>in</strong> Chat Communication<br />
Gabriel Dorta<br />
Universidad Central de Venezuela<br />
Until now, research about chat communication has not paid attention to some pragmatic<br />
elements such as the peculiarities of the medium which <strong>in</strong>fluences the way <strong>in</strong> which<br />
participants manage each communicative situation, their social relationships are def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
<strong>and</strong> negotiated, <strong>and</strong> politeness is expressed. In this paper, I will analyse the processes of<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>and</strong> negotiation of social relationships with<strong>in</strong> politeness strategies. Politeness<br />
will be considered as an <strong>in</strong>tersubjective phenomenon which depends on its context of<br />
occurrence <strong>and</strong> some particularities of this form of computer-mediated communication.<br />
It represents a salient communicative behaviour <strong>in</strong> chats; it is put <strong>in</strong>to practice to<br />
overcome some restrictions of the medium <strong>and</strong> to express a partial commitment,<br />
friendl<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong> closeness among participants.<br />
1. Introduction<br />
Due to the restriction of chat-rooms to the written communication channel,<br />
research has so far been centered on the follow<strong>in</strong>g aspects: i) the analysis of<br />
typographical, lexical <strong>and</strong> syntactic features which are seen <strong>in</strong> most approaches as<br />
part of the participants’ competences to achieve a successful exchange (cf.<br />
Runkehl et al. 1998:112) ; ii) the description of elements related to written <strong>and</strong><br />
oral language features (cf. ibid:84; Bittner 2003:237) <strong>and</strong> iii) the emphasis on the<br />
artificial <strong>and</strong> virtual character of the chatters’ social relationships (cf. Götzenbrucker<br />
& Hummel 2001:203, among others). Chat communication is consequently<br />
seen as a f<strong>in</strong>al product <strong>in</strong> such approaches. In this paper, chats will be<br />
considered, on the contrary, as process-orientated. The mutual <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>between</strong><br />
some peculiarities of this form of mediated communication <strong>and</strong> the participants’<br />
l<strong>in</strong>guistic behaviour can play an important role <strong>in</strong> the way chatters constitute <strong>and</strong><br />
negotiate their social relationships to express politeness. As I go along, answers<br />
will be given to the follow<strong>in</strong>g questions which have not yet been fully accounted<br />
for: How do (un)acqua<strong>in</strong>ted people manage their <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>in</strong> a written medium?<br />
In which way do they def<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> negotiate their social relationships? How is<br />
politeness expressed <strong>in</strong> chat communication?<br />
In chapter 2, I will describe <strong>and</strong> illustrate some of the peculiarities of the<br />
medium under the concept of non-committal frame (Höflich & Gebhardt 2001).<br />
After that, follow<strong>in</strong>g Watts’ (2003) explanations, politeness will be def<strong>in</strong>ed as a