Dialogue in and between Different Cultures - International ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

148 Angelika Fröhlich & Sonja Lux parting sequences. Further investigations by separating groups within the national groups before comparing them could be useful. Concerning the nonverbal behaviour, we discovered a noticeable difference that should be investigated deeper, taking into consideration the different strategies of chatters and comparing them – perhaps with a quantities study in order to comprehend the extent of difference. After the summing-up, we come to the conclusion that differences between the nations are not as large as one might have thought. The differences are slight in some aspects and a little bit larger in other aspects, but the tendency is towards a similar behaviour in chat rooms. Both nations have adapted to a cultural behaviour on the Internet that is regulated by netiquettes and the restrictions of electronic communication. The culture of the Internet has a stronger influence on the behaviour of the chatters than their own culture. Thus, we come to the conclusion that on the Internet a new culture has formed, easily accessible from a random part of the world. References Beisswenger, Michael. 2002. Chat-Kommunikation. Sprache, Interaktion, Sozialität & Identität in synchroner computervermittelter Kommunikation Perspektiven auf ein interdisziplinäres Forschungsfeld. Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag. Crystal, David. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Das Erste: ARD/ZDF-Online-Studie 2007. Online in Internet: WWW: http://www.daserste.de/ service/studie.asp [cited 2006-11-07]. Dorta, Gabriel. 2007. “Politeness and Social Dynamics in Chat Communication”. This volume. Feller, Sebastian. 2007. “Cultural Differences in the Speech Act of Greeting”. Dialogue and Culture ed. by Marion Grein & Edda Weigand, 177-190. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Fix, Tina. 2001. Generation @ im Chat. München: KoPäd-Verlag. Hentschel, Elke. 1998. “Communication on IRC”. Linguistik online 1,1/98. URL: http://www. linguistik-online. de/irc.htm [cited 2008-01-25]. Hess-Lüttich, Ernest W. B. & Eva Wilde. 2004. “Der Chat als Textsorte und/oder als Dialogsorte?” particulae collectae. Festschrift für Harald Weydt zum 65. Geburtstag. Linguistik online 13,1/03:161-180. URL: http://www.linguistik-online.com/13_01/hessLuettich Wilde. html [cited 2008-01-25] Höflich, Joachim. 1998. “Computerrahmen und die undifferenzierte Wirkungsfrage”. Onlinekommunikation. Beiträge zu Nutzen und Wirkung ed. by P. Rössler, 47-64. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. IETF: Network Guidelines. Online in Internet: URL: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 [cited 2007- 11-07] Kid’s Turn Central: Netiquette. Minding your P’s and Q’s Online in Chat rooms. Online in Internet: WWW: http://www.kidsturncentral.com/chat/chatnet.htm [cited 2006-11-07] Misoch, Sabine. 2006. Online-Kommunikation. Konstanz: UKV Verlagsgesellschaft. Runkehl, Jens, Peter Schlobinski & Torsten Siever. 1998. Sprache und Kommunikation im Internet. Überblick und Analysen. Wiesbaden: Opladen. Spartanburg Community College: Netiquette. Online in Internet: URL: http://dl.stcsc.edu/ netiquette.htm [cited 2007-11-07] Storti, Craig. 2001. The Art of Crossing Cultures. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.
Chat Behaviour Intercultural 149 Thaler, Verena. 2003. Chat-Kommunikation im Spannungsfeld zwischen Oralität und Literalität. Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Forschung. The Public Opinion Foundation: Project The Internet in Russia/Russia on the Internet”. 19th Release. Spring 2007. Online in Internet: URL: http://bd.english.fom.ru/report/map/eint0702 [cited 2007-11-07] Wenz, Karin. 1998. “Formen der Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit in digitalen Medien”. Linguistik online 1, 1/98. URL: http://www.linguistik-online.de/wenz.htm [cited 2007-11-07] Wirth, Uwe. 2002. “Schwatzhafter Schriftverkehr. Chatten in den Zeiten des Modemfiebers”. Praxis Internet ed. by Stefan Münker & Alexander Roesler, 208-231. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Page 2 and 3:
iada.online.series Volume 1/08 Dial
Page 4 and 5:
Edited by Marion Grein Dialogue in
Page 7 and 8:
Introduction The core of this first
Page 9 and 10:
The Practice of Repeating in Englis
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21:
Page 24 and 25:
16 Marion Grein sympathisch empfund
Page 26 and 27:
18 Marion Grein 4. Funktionen des S
Page 28 and 29:
20 Marion Grein 6. Frequenz von Kom
Page 30 and 31:
22 Marion Grein 4 You did a [INT] A
Page 32 and 33:
24 Marion Grein 6 Metaphorische Ans
Page 34 and 35:
26 Marion Grein betreffen hier posi
Page 36 and 37:
28 Marion Grein denen man ein Kompl
Page 38 and 39:
30 Marion Grein Japan (Barnlund&Ara
Page 40 and 41:
32 Marion Grein Goffman, Erving. 19
Page 42 and 43:
34 Yana Tregubova kultureller Aspek
Page 44 and 45:
36 Yana Tregubova speziell in Auffo
Page 46 and 47:
38 Yana Tregubova Warum wird die Ge
Page 48 and 49:
40 Yana Tregubova zählt, sollte es
Page 50 and 51:
42 Yana Tregubova Betrachten wir ex
Page 52 and 53:
44 Yana Tregubova Dienste der illok
Page 54 and 55:
46 Yana Tregubova merksamkeit viel
Page 56 and 57:
48 Yana Tregubova 10. Umgang mit En
Page 58 and 59:
50 Yana Tregubova noch um Verständ
Page 61 and 62:
The Impact of Socio-Cultural Aspect
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71:
Page 74 and 75:
66 Elena Xeni including slang, argo
Page 76 and 77:
68 Elena Xeni − in cases where it
Page 78 and 79:
70 Elena Xeni Conventions and norms
Page 81 and 82:
Cultural Dialogue between France an
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
9. Translating the term «Contrat P
Page 93:
Page 96 and 97:
88 Anna Szczepaniak-Kozak Consequen
Page 98 and 99:
90 Anna Szczepaniak-Kozak to make c
Page 100 and 101:
92 Anna Szczepaniak-Kozak readers c
Page 102 and 103:
94 Anna Szczepaniak-Kozak are unifo
Page 105 and 106: Religiöse Euphemismen im Griechisc
Page 113 and 114: Deutsche Euphemismen: Religiöse Eu
Page 115 and 116: Deutsche Euphemismen: Religiöse Eu
Page 117 and 118: - Begraben werden: seine letzte Ruh
Page 119 and 120: Politeness and Social Dynamics in C
Page 121 and 122: Politeness and Social Dynamics in t
Page 123 and 124: (2) Example (recording 19_15.09.01
Page 133 and 134: Chat Behaviour Intercultural Some a
Page 135 and 136: Chat Behaviour Intercultural 127 of
Page 137 and 138: 3.2 Netiquette Chat Behaviour Inter
Page 139 and 140: Chat Behaviour Intercultural 131 di
Page 141 and 142: Chat Behaviour Intercultural 133 ba
Page 143 and 144: Chat Behaviour Intercultural 135 Sn
Page 145 and 146: Chat Behaviour Intercultural 137 (8
Page 147 and 148: Chat Behaviour Intercultural 139 di
Page 149 and 150: Chat Behaviour Intercultural 141 (1
Page 151 and 152: Chat Behaviour Intercultural 143 Ve
Page 153 and 154: “BillyBoy: Hey freche Liesl! =) F
Page 155: Chat Behaviour Intercultural 147
Page 160: 152 List of Contributors Dr. Neelak
show all

Dialogue in and between Different Cultures - International ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?