21.12.2012 Views

Dialogue in and between Different Cultures - International ...

Dialogue in and between Different Cultures - International ...

Dialogue in and between Different Cultures - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 Jagdish Kaur<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence how often speakers repeat themselves <strong>in</strong> talk, the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of the present<br />

study suggest that it does not however affect the actual use of this resource when<br />

shared underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g is at stake. Participants of diverse cultural groups have been<br />

found <strong>in</strong> this study to repeat themselves <strong>in</strong> identical ways <strong>in</strong> the same contexts <strong>in</strong><br />

order to facilitate <strong>and</strong> enhance underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> English as a l<strong>in</strong>gua franca.<br />

5. Conclusion<br />

The study set out to establish how the practice of repeat<strong>in</strong>g was employed by a<br />

group of non-native speakers of English to negotiate <strong>and</strong> co-construct<br />

underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a language that was not their native language, namely <strong>in</strong> English<br />

as a l<strong>in</strong>gua franca. While repetition was found to be employed <strong>in</strong> various contexts<br />

for a variety of purposes, this paper has focused on the use of repetition <strong>in</strong> two<br />

specific contexts, namely after overlap <strong>and</strong> after an open class repair <strong>in</strong>itiator. In<br />

the case of the former, repetition provided the recipient with another opportunity<br />

at hear<strong>in</strong>g the segment of talk produced <strong>in</strong> overlap, hence possibly pre-empt<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

problem of underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g that may have occurred as a result of the overlap. In the<br />

case of the latter, repetition was used as a means of resolv<strong>in</strong>g a problem of<br />

hear<strong>in</strong>g or underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g that had occurred as <strong>in</strong>dicated by the recipient’s use of a<br />

repair <strong>in</strong>itiator.<br />

While the number of examples exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this paper has necessarily been<br />

small as a result of limitations of space, they represent for the most part the many<br />

<strong>in</strong>stances of repetition <strong>in</strong> the aforementioned contexts found to occur <strong>in</strong> the data.<br />

The participants were found to employ the practice of repeat<strong>in</strong>g consistently <strong>in</strong><br />

these two contexts irrespective of their l<strong>in</strong>gua-cultural background. Further, the<br />

way <strong>in</strong> which this practice was employed showed no discernible differences. The<br />

participants repeated prior segments of talk produced <strong>in</strong> overlap when overlap<br />

was thought to possibly impair the recipient’s underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of that segment of<br />

talk. Similarly, the participants repeated a prior turn when the recipient signalled<br />

that the turn was problematic <strong>in</strong> some way. In both cases, the participants sought<br />

to provide redundancy as a means of address<strong>in</strong>g a problem of underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g, both<br />

real <strong>and</strong> potential. In this regard, the practice of repeat<strong>in</strong>g appears to function as a<br />

universal device used by speakers of English as a l<strong>in</strong>gua franca to contribute<br />

towards shared underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g.<br />

References<br />

Bremer, Kathar<strong>in</strong>a, Marie-Therese Vasseur & Margaret Simonot. 1996. Achiev<strong>in</strong>g Underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g:<br />

Discourse <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tercultural encounters. London: Longman.<br />

Drew, Paul. 1997. “’Open Class Repair Initiators <strong>in</strong> Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles <strong>in</strong><br />

Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 28:69-101.<br />

Firth, Allan. 1990. “‘L<strong>in</strong>gua franca’ Negotiations: Towards an <strong>in</strong>teractional approach”. World<br />

Englishes 9/3:269-280.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!