Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a
Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a
Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8 – Exploring Open Source <strong>for</strong> Educators: We’re Not in Kansas Anymore – Entering OS<br />
Clearly there is evidence of significant interest in<br />
open source <strong>and</strong> free software—if only measured at a<br />
shallow level by operating system interest or website hits.<br />
According to Fima Katz, CEO of Exadel, “The real<br />
problem is widespread unfamiliarity <strong>and</strong> lack of expertise<br />
with open source [<strong>and</strong> free software] across all levels<br />
of the organization” (V world New Media [Designs4nuke.com],<br />
February 7, 2006). A survey by Exadel<br />
conducted at the 2005 Gartner Open Source Summit<br />
found that “more than half (55%) of survey respondents<br />
reported that their organizations currently have limited<br />
internal knowledge of open source[/free software]” (as<br />
cited in V world New Media [Designs4nuke.com], February<br />
7, 2006). Moreover, the February 23, 2005 Gartner<br />
report, “Positions 2005: Open-Source Solutions Will<br />
Restructure the Software Industry,” found that “40 percent<br />
of respondents claimed that their organization’s<br />
lack of knowledge about open source [/free software] as<br />
the top vulnerability to adoption” (as cited in V <strong>World</strong><br />
New Media [Designs4nuke.com], February 7, 2006).<br />
Despite the various barriers, current trends indicate<br />
that freely sourced software will flourish, as witness the<br />
proliferation of Apache servers, GNU/Linux operating<br />
systems, as well as ATutor, Sakai, <strong>and</strong> Moodle sites, To<br />
ensure this, Potter (2000) offers the following suggestions:<br />
<strong>for</strong>mation of a non-profit <strong>and</strong>/or governmental<br />
body to certify interoperability <strong>and</strong> portability of freely<br />
sourced software; using freely sourced software code as a<br />
legal remedy <strong>for</strong> monopoly, anti-trust, <strong>and</strong> copyright suits;<br />
as well as government endorsement of freely sourced<br />
software through its own policies, adoption, <strong>and</strong> use.<br />
The question then is: when, if ever, is it the right time<br />
<strong>for</strong> you to migrate to freely sourced software? Only a<br />
comprehensive contextual assessment of your situation,<br />
as well as increasing your knowledge of free software<br />
<strong>and</strong> open source, can help you make that decision. The<br />
next sections offer a possible methodology to increase<br />
your knowledge, <strong>and</strong> move <strong>from</strong> initial considerations<br />
of freely sourced options to implementing pilot projects<br />
<strong>and</strong> widespread organizational adoption.<br />
Common misperceptions of the<br />
“Great” Wizard<br />
“The wizard? But nobody can see the great Oz.<br />
Nobody’s ever seen the great Oz … Even I’ve never<br />
seen him!” – Guardian of the Emerald City Gates,<br />
The Wizard of Oz (Langley, 1939)<br />
Just as Dorothy, the Tin Man, the Lion <strong>and</strong> the Scarecrow<br />
held misconceptions of Oz’s Wizard, there are many misconceptions<br />
about open source <strong>and</strong> free software. Some of<br />
the most common of these are (1) freely sourced programs<br />
have no costs; (2) freely sourced programs are of<br />
low quality; <strong>and</strong> (3) freely sourced programs can’t compete<br />
with proprietary commercial applications.<br />
MISCONCEPTION 1: NO COST<br />
As a point of clarification, source code is free in open<br />
source <strong>and</strong> free software applications. Chances are,<br />
though, you will still need someone or several people<br />
with technical know-how to install them, run them,<br />
tweak them, update them, etc. Sometimes the original<br />
developers provide this kind of support <strong>for</strong> a price. One<br />
example of this is ATutor (http://www.atutor.ca), a Canadian<br />
open source content management system <strong>for</strong><br />
course delivery developed at the University of Toronto<br />
<strong>and</strong> licensed under GNU’s GPL (Adaptive Technology<br />
Resource Centre, 2006). ATutor claims to be, “the first<br />
inclusive LCMS complying with … accessibility specifications<br />
at the AA+ level, allowing access to all potential<br />
learners, instructors, <strong>and</strong> administrators, including<br />
those with disabilities” (Adaptive Technology Resource<br />
Centre, 2006). ATutor also complies with “W3C XHTML<br />
1.0 specifications” so it is “presented consistently in any<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards compliant technology” (Adaptive Technology<br />
Resource Centre, 2006). It allows <strong>for</strong> content portability<br />
by compliance with “IMS/SCORM Content Packaging<br />
specifications, allowing content developers to create<br />
reusable content that can be swapped between different<br />
e-learning systems” (Adaptive Technology Resource<br />
Centre, 2006). If you need help with the technical end of<br />
things, you can purchase varying levels of ATutor support,<br />
<strong>from</strong> one-time installation to course hosting <strong>and</strong><br />
individualized consulting.<br />
Recent mergers of commercial proprietary businesses<br />
have made it difficult to accurately reflect current fees<br />
<strong>for</strong> similar proprietary commercial service provision.<br />
Actual amounts vary based on enrollment volume as<br />
well as bargaining power of a purchaser. Available in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
can give us a rough idea of current price points. A<br />
posting by Michael Penney (July 29, 2005), Learning<br />
Management System Project Manager <strong>for</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia State<br />
University, Humboldt, cited basic Blackboard institution<br />
costs as follows <strong>for</strong> 7,500 course enrollments: a base fee of<br />
approximately $7,000 US, $4,000 US <strong>for</strong> encryption, <strong>and</strong><br />
$0.75 US per enrollment <strong>for</strong> MSSQL ($5,625 US/7,500<br />
enrollments). This would total approximately $16,625<br />
<strong>for</strong> 7,500 course enrollments—exclusive of any content<br />
or course development. Blackboard can provide some<br />
economies of scale compared to other commercial pro-<br />
<strong>Education</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Digital</strong> <strong>World</strong> 103