06.09.2021 Views

Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a

Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a

Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11 – Accessibility <strong>and</strong> Universal Design<br />

Description<br />

9 Plugins, applets & scripts<br />

Pages are usable when scripts, applets, or other<br />

programmatic objects are turned off or not<br />

supported.<br />

Assists: Vision, Cognitive, Motion, Hearing<br />

10 “Last resort”<br />

If, after best ef<strong>for</strong>ts, the material cannot be<br />

made accessible, a link is provided to an alternative,<br />

accessible page that has equivalent<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation (or functionality), <strong>and</strong> is updated<br />

as often as the inaccessible (original) page.<br />

Assists: Vision, Cognitive, Motion, Hearing<br />

Table 11.4. Accessibility evaluation chart—detailed<br />

Rating details<br />

5—Turning off plugin/script leads to fallback alternative<br />

3—Turning off plugin/script loses functionality, but site is<br />

still otherwise usable<br />

1—Site cannot be used without plugin/script<br />

5—Original pages adequate, or alternative pages provided<br />

when necessary<br />

3—Alternative page provided, but not equivalent<br />

1—No alternative pages provided when needed, or alternative<br />

pages provided when original pages could be made<br />

accessible<br />

Rating<br />

(1–5) Notes<br />

Case studies<br />

From 2005–2006, the University of British Columbia was<br />

involved in a BCcampus-funded project on web accessibility<br />

in online learning. During the project, we created a<br />

focus group of people with different disabilities. Based<br />

on their comments, modifications <strong>and</strong> redesigns were<br />

done on five courses that were piloted in summer 2006<br />

as “accessible courses”. Where possible, we asked the<br />

participants to use their own computers at home, which<br />

were already adapted according to their usage <strong>and</strong> personal<br />

preferences. When in the office, we tried to imitate<br />

their home setting, giving them a choice of using Windows<br />

or Mac OS <strong>and</strong> their preferred browser. We<br />

wanted to avoid the additional barriers of working on a<br />

new computer in an unknown environment, <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

participants to experience the same situation as our registered<br />

students. There<strong>for</strong>e, our introductions <strong>and</strong> instructions<br />

were limited to what they would get <strong>from</strong> an<br />

instructor in advance. We only limited their browsing<br />

by asking them to focus on specific pages rather than<br />

reading the whole course content. Focus group members<br />

were interviewed individually be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>and</strong> after the<br />

modifications. The first set of questions was about how<br />

their disability affected their ability to navigate the<br />

course material <strong>and</strong> what improvements would make<br />

the material more accessible <strong>for</strong> them. Questions after<br />

the modifications involved quality of the presentation,<br />

usability of the interface <strong>and</strong> usefulness of the system.<br />

In our consultations with the participants, we asked<br />

them <strong>for</strong> their oral or written feedback <strong>and</strong> opinions on<br />

their experience. The names in these cases have been<br />

changed <strong>for</strong> privacy reasons.<br />

CASE 1: SAMUEL<br />

Description. Samuel is a hard-of-hearing English as a<br />

Second Language (ESL) student <strong>from</strong> Korea. Online<br />

courses had been recommended to him as a good choice<br />

to remove the barrier of his impairment.<br />

Issues. Samuel was surprised <strong>and</strong> disappointed with<br />

the amount of text-based material in the courses that he<br />

took. He compared them with the online courses in Korea,<br />

which included a considerable amount of video<br />

excerpts. Because English is not his native language,<br />

Samuel struggles in traditional classroom classes. Despite<br />

that, he would rather meet face-to-face, or use a<br />

webcam to see emotions <strong>and</strong> gestures, than attempt to<br />

pick them up <strong>from</strong> text alone.<br />

Comment <strong>and</strong> recommendation. Making content<br />

text-only does not necessarily make it more accessible. It<br />

works well with a screen reader, but there is no benefit<br />

<strong>for</strong> a hearing-impaired student. Instead of omitting all<br />

the media, more attention should be devoted to providing<br />

alternatives to pure audio, such as transcripts, or<br />

captions <strong>for</strong> video components. See the example in Figure<br />

11.7 where a video segment is accompanied by transcripts<br />

<strong>and</strong> audio.<br />

Webcam support is a common feature in instant messaging<br />

software, <strong>and</strong> students are increasingly com<strong>for</strong>table<br />

with its use. While not every student can reasonably<br />

be expected to own a webcam, video messaging supported<br />

by text messaging would be of greater benefit to<br />

Samuel than a st<strong>and</strong>ard text-based <strong>for</strong>um, allowing him not<br />

only to see others’ facial expressions, but also to encounter<br />

<strong>and</strong> practise spoken English at a functional level.<br />

<strong>Education</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Digital</strong> <strong>World</strong> 177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!