Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a
Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a
Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
11 – Accessibility <strong>and</strong> Universal Design<br />
Description<br />
9 Plugins, applets & scripts<br />
Pages are usable when scripts, applets, or other<br />
programmatic objects are turned off or not<br />
supported.<br />
Assists: Vision, Cognitive, Motion, Hearing<br />
10 “Last resort”<br />
If, after best ef<strong>for</strong>ts, the material cannot be<br />
made accessible, a link is provided to an alternative,<br />
accessible page that has equivalent<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation (or functionality), <strong>and</strong> is updated<br />
as often as the inaccessible (original) page.<br />
Assists: Vision, Cognitive, Motion, Hearing<br />
Table 11.4. Accessibility evaluation chart—detailed<br />
Rating details<br />
5—Turning off plugin/script leads to fallback alternative<br />
3—Turning off plugin/script loses functionality, but site is<br />
still otherwise usable<br />
1—Site cannot be used without plugin/script<br />
5—Original pages adequate, or alternative pages provided<br />
when necessary<br />
3—Alternative page provided, but not equivalent<br />
1—No alternative pages provided when needed, or alternative<br />
pages provided when original pages could be made<br />
accessible<br />
Rating<br />
(1–5) Notes<br />
Case studies<br />
From 2005–2006, the University of British Columbia was<br />
involved in a BCcampus-funded project on web accessibility<br />
in online learning. During the project, we created a<br />
focus group of people with different disabilities. Based<br />
on their comments, modifications <strong>and</strong> redesigns were<br />
done on five courses that were piloted in summer 2006<br />
as “accessible courses”. Where possible, we asked the<br />
participants to use their own computers at home, which<br />
were already adapted according to their usage <strong>and</strong> personal<br />
preferences. When in the office, we tried to imitate<br />
their home setting, giving them a choice of using Windows<br />
or Mac OS <strong>and</strong> their preferred browser. We<br />
wanted to avoid the additional barriers of working on a<br />
new computer in an unknown environment, <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />
participants to experience the same situation as our registered<br />
students. There<strong>for</strong>e, our introductions <strong>and</strong> instructions<br />
were limited to what they would get <strong>from</strong> an<br />
instructor in advance. We only limited their browsing<br />
by asking them to focus on specific pages rather than<br />
reading the whole course content. Focus group members<br />
were interviewed individually be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>and</strong> after the<br />
modifications. The first set of questions was about how<br />
their disability affected their ability to navigate the<br />
course material <strong>and</strong> what improvements would make<br />
the material more accessible <strong>for</strong> them. Questions after<br />
the modifications involved quality of the presentation,<br />
usability of the interface <strong>and</strong> usefulness of the system.<br />
In our consultations with the participants, we asked<br />
them <strong>for</strong> their oral or written feedback <strong>and</strong> opinions on<br />
their experience. The names in these cases have been<br />
changed <strong>for</strong> privacy reasons.<br />
CASE 1: SAMUEL<br />
Description. Samuel is a hard-of-hearing English as a<br />
Second Language (ESL) student <strong>from</strong> Korea. Online<br />
courses had been recommended to him as a good choice<br />
to remove the barrier of his impairment.<br />
Issues. Samuel was surprised <strong>and</strong> disappointed with<br />
the amount of text-based material in the courses that he<br />
took. He compared them with the online courses in Korea,<br />
which included a considerable amount of video<br />
excerpts. Because English is not his native language,<br />
Samuel struggles in traditional classroom classes. Despite<br />
that, he would rather meet face-to-face, or use a<br />
webcam to see emotions <strong>and</strong> gestures, than attempt to<br />
pick them up <strong>from</strong> text alone.<br />
Comment <strong>and</strong> recommendation. Making content<br />
text-only does not necessarily make it more accessible. It<br />
works well with a screen reader, but there is no benefit<br />
<strong>for</strong> a hearing-impaired student. Instead of omitting all<br />
the media, more attention should be devoted to providing<br />
alternatives to pure audio, such as transcripts, or<br />
captions <strong>for</strong> video components. See the example in Figure<br />
11.7 where a video segment is accompanied by transcripts<br />
<strong>and</strong> audio.<br />
Webcam support is a common feature in instant messaging<br />
software, <strong>and</strong> students are increasingly com<strong>for</strong>table<br />
with its use. While not every student can reasonably<br />
be expected to own a webcam, video messaging supported<br />
by text messaging would be of greater benefit to<br />
Samuel than a st<strong>and</strong>ard text-based <strong>for</strong>um, allowing him not<br />
only to see others’ facial expressions, but also to encounter<br />
<strong>and</strong> practise spoken English at a functional level.<br />
<strong>Education</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Digital</strong> <strong>World</strong> 177