Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a
Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a
Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
19 – Building Communities of <strong>Practice</strong><br />
cently a RSS feed has been added to help push<br />
communication about these activities out so that<br />
those interested in participation are made aware<br />
<strong>and</strong> can choose to participate if they want. All<br />
these are ways in which we are attempting to foster<br />
participation.” Small Cities Case Study, written by<br />
Dan O'Reilly<br />
Enhancing community<br />
The abundance of technology has changed the lives of<br />
Canadians. Some researchers suggest that through open<br />
trade policies <strong>and</strong> the reduction of the barriers associated<br />
with adopting new technology, efficient distribution<br />
of in<strong>for</strong>mation can be encouraged (Hoekman et al,<br />
2004). Other researchers argue that, through targeted<br />
intervention, this in<strong>for</strong>mation can be used to create new<br />
<strong>for</strong>ms of learning <strong>and</strong> community practices. Though the<br />
analysis of trade policies may provide valuable insight<br />
into economic development of digital communities, we<br />
will focus here instead on the development of community<br />
learning. From this perspective, facilitating the integration<br />
of new in<strong>for</strong>mation may provide insight into the<br />
manner in which individuals contribute to community<br />
practices, leaving the issues of personal <strong>and</strong> community<br />
economic development issues aside. If you are interested<br />
in this topic, there are several articles within the References<br />
section worth reading.<br />
Facilitating the learning experience<br />
Researchers have been increasingly addressing the complex<br />
issue of learning within a technologically diverse<br />
<strong>and</strong> complex social environment. Wenger (2004b) suggests<br />
that:<br />
“The challenges that we face today can be understood<br />
as learning challenges … [<strong>and</strong>] all these<br />
challenges require accelerated learning at multiple<br />
levels of scales at once, <strong>from</strong> individuals, to communities,<br />
to regions, to the whole world. But such<br />
deep <strong>and</strong> multi-scale learning is not simply a cognitive<br />
challenge; it entails a trans<strong>for</strong>mation of our<br />
very identities”.<br />
Provoking reflection <strong>and</strong> interpretation of new in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
supported by technological infrastructure can<br />
trans<strong>for</strong>m the way we engage with the world. Wenger<br />
suggests that these “complex situations where everyone<br />
belongs to very large numbers of different communities<br />
over the course of their lives <strong>and</strong> at any given time …<br />
[shows that] each person is a unique intersection of<br />
multi-membership” (Wenger, 2004b, p. 5). By leveraging<br />
this multi-membership <strong>and</strong> reifying the relationships<br />
between individuals, 63 IBM researchers suggest that contributions<br />
to in<strong>for</strong>mation management practices can reflect<br />
the dynamic <strong>and</strong> flexible nature of human interaction.<br />
Conceptually, Wenger suggests that the reason human<br />
interaction is dynamic <strong>and</strong> flexible is founded in<br />
our ability to negotiate new meaning <strong>and</strong> incorporate<br />
that meaning into our community involvement <strong>and</strong><br />
identity (2004b, p. 5). Through facilitation, it may become<br />
possible <strong>for</strong> individuals to benefit <strong>from</strong> key factors<br />
that researchers such as Wenger suggest are critical<br />
within all communities of practices—providing stimulation<br />
to the learners’ imaginations, aligning <strong>and</strong> coordinating<br />
of ef<strong>for</strong>ts between individuals, <strong>and</strong> engaging<br />
individuals in new practices (1998).<br />
As technology continues to develop towards supporting<br />
newly created <strong>and</strong> dynamic teams, perhaps the<br />
facilitation of technology could benefit <strong>from</strong> group leadership<br />
<strong>and</strong> development skills. Techniques <strong>for</strong> developing<br />
these skills have been ingrained into the operational<br />
practices of leadership development <strong>and</strong> training centres<br />
such as Outward Bound <strong>and</strong> certification programs such<br />
as the Association of Canadian Mountain Guides. The<br />
following sections highlight selected techniques <strong>for</strong> developing<br />
these group leadership skills.<br />
Facilitation techniques<br />
Although group facilitation techniques are varied, adventure<br />
guiding researchers have identified several<br />
structural features that encourage behaviour that meets<br />
group expectations. These structural features include the<br />
group focus of activities, the use of metaphoric processing,<br />
<strong>and</strong> exposure to unfamiliar environmental conditions<br />
(Newes, n.d.). By manipulating these structural<br />
features facilitators can alter the amount of cognitive<br />
load required by participants, thus reducing stress <strong>and</strong><br />
mental fatigue (Fabrizio & Niell, n.d., p. 6). While discom<strong>for</strong>t<br />
can initiate personal growth <strong>and</strong> development,<br />
substantial time <strong>and</strong> interaction must be provided. The<br />
proper sequencing of events <strong>and</strong> content can provide<br />
participants a natural progression towards full commu-<br />
63<br />
Wenger’s extensive research within the field of community<br />
development describes the situated nature of learning<br />
<strong>and</strong> provides the foundation <strong>for</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing how individuals<br />
develop meaning <strong>and</strong> identity within the community<br />
of practice (<strong>and</strong> the larger organization). Brown <strong>and</strong><br />
Duguid’s article, entitled “Organizational Learning <strong>and</strong><br />
Communities of <strong>Practice</strong>”, presents Lave <strong>and</strong> Wenger’s<br />
social learning theory of legitimate peripheral participation,<br />
which suggests that the <strong>for</strong>mation of knowledge occurs<br />
through collective learning <strong>and</strong> renegotiated meaning of<br />
past <strong>and</strong> future events, constructing a community practice.<br />
300 <strong>Education</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Digital</strong> <strong>World</strong>