Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a

9 – Quality Assurance by Design
November-December 2005. Retrieved August 8, 2006,
http://www.jot.fm/issues/issue_2005_11/column4
Forsblom, N. & Silius, K. 2002. Value Added on Webbased
Learning Environments. In Pantzar, E. (Ed.).
Perspectives on the Age of the Information Society. Reports
of the Information Research Programme of the
Academy of Finland. Tampere University Press, pp.
103–113.
Forsblom, N. and K. Silius (2001). What is the Added
Value of Web-based Learning and Teaching? The Case
of Tampere University of Technology. Retrieved May
24, 2006, https://ep.eur.nl/bitstream/1765/1225/1/3+
What+is+the+added+value+of+web-based.pdf
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
Garrett, R. (2004). The real story behind the failure of
the UK eUniversity. Educause Quarterly, 27(4). p. 3–
6. Retrieved March 16, 2006, http://www.educause
.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0440.pdf
Gentry, C. (1994). Introduction to instructional development.
Belmont, Ca, USA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
Grahan, C., Cagiltay, J. Lim, B., Craner, J. & Duffy, T.M.
(2002). Seven Principles of Effective Teaching: A Practical
Lens for Evaluating Online Courses. Michigan
Virtual University. Retrieved, http://ts.mivu.org/default
.asp?show=article&id=839
Greeno, J; Smith, D & Moore, J (1993). Transfer of Situated
Learning. In D. Detterman & R. Sternberg
(Eds.). Transfer on Trial. Norwood, New Jersey:
Ablex Publishing Corporation. Pp. 99–167.
Grosz, B & Sidner, C. (1986). Attention, Intentions, and
the Structure of Discourse. Computational Linguistics,
12(3), 175–204.
GSN, Greek Schools Network. Retrieved May 31, 2006,
http://www.sch.gr/en/
Hale, C. & French, D. (1999) Web-related Assessment
and Evaluation. In: French, D., Internet Based Learning:
An Introduction and A Framework for Higher Education
and Industry. Stylus Publications, USA.
Harasim, L. (1989). Online Education: A New Domain.
In R. Mason and A. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communications,
computers, and distance education. Oxford:
Pergamon Press. Pp. 74–85.
Harvey, V.S. (2004). Evaluation Methods for On-Line
Programs. Retrieved May 31, 2006, http://www.massa
chusetts.edu/administration/itc/pdgrants/04reports/h
arvey.html
Hedberg, J., Wills, S., Oliver, R., Harper, B. & Agostinho,
S. (2002). Developing Evaluation Frameworks for Assessing
Quality ICT-based Learning in Higher Education.
In P. Barker & S. Rebelsky (Eds.), Proceedings
of ED-MEDIA 2002, World Conference on Educational
Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications
(pp. 729–735). Denver, Colorado, USA: Association
for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Hughes, J. A. (1999). The General Acceptance of
Ethnography in System Design. In the Proceedings of
the Conference Ethnography in systems design: an
Industrial Approach to Work Analysis and Software
Design. Thursday April 29th 1999. The Conference
Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Retrieved May 23, 2006, http://www.comp.lancs.ac
.uk/computing/research/cseg/projects/coherence/wor
kshop/Hughes.html
Hughes, J. A., O’Brien, J., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M. &
Blythin, S. (1997). Designing with Ethnography: a
presentation framework for design. Paper presented
at the Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems,
Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive
Systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge
Mass: MIT Press.
International Standard Organization ISO/IEC 19796-1,
Retrieved March 16, 2006, http://www.iso.org/iso/en
/commcentre/pressreleases/2006/Ref992.html
ISO 9000, The Benjamin Franklin Institute of Global
Education. (2001). Distance education: Quality assurance
initiative. Retrieved April 5, 2004, http://www
.academyWeb.com/DEQA
ISO FDIS 9241-11. Ergonomic Requirements for Office
Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs), Part
11: Guidance on Usability Specification and Measures.
Technical report, 1997.
Jonassen, David H. (1991). Evaluating constructivistic
learning. Educational Technology, 31, 28–33.
Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., Shaik, N. & Palma-Rivas, N.
(2000) Comparative Analysis of Learner Satisfaction and
Learning Outcomes in Online and Face to Face Learning
Environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research,
11(1). Retrieved August 8, 2006, http://www.aace.org
/dl/files/JILR/JILR11129.pdf
Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2004). Designs for learning. E-
learning, 1(1), 38–92.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Shield, L. (2004). The Keys to
Usability in E-learning Websites. In the Proceedings
of the Networked Learning Conference 2004, 5–7
April, 2004, Lancaster University, UK. Retrieved
August 8, 2006, http://www.networkedlearningcon
ference.org.uk/past/nlc2004/proceedings/individual_
papers/kukulska_shield.htm
Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework
for human computer interaction research. In
Nardi, B. A. (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity
126 Education for a Digital World