Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a
Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a
Education for a Digital World Advice, Guidelines and Effective Practice from Around Globe, 2008a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
12 – Articulation <strong>and</strong> Transfer of Online Courses<br />
Even within an integrated post-secondary environment<br />
characterized by open <strong>and</strong> transparent articulation<br />
relationship, faculty frequently raise the question of<br />
whether mode of delivery can affect, or should affect, the<br />
articulation of a course. For example, in British Columbia,<br />
faculty members <strong>from</strong> each institution in the BC<br />
Transfer System meet every year in discipline-based<br />
groups, known as Articulation Committees. These committees<br />
operate under the aegis of the British Columbia<br />
Council on Admissions <strong>and</strong> Transfer (BCCAT). Meeting<br />
minutes collected by BCCAT reveal that the articulation<br />
of online courses is often debated (BCCAT 2005).<br />
Issues <strong>and</strong> concerns are varied:<br />
• Many groups are enthusiastic about converting their<br />
curriculum to online delivery <strong>for</strong>mats, <strong>and</strong> see this<br />
mode of delivery as attractive to potential students<br />
• Concerns are raised about quality control, <strong>and</strong> about<br />
assessment methods used in online courses <strong>and</strong> how<br />
student evaluation is safeguarded <strong>and</strong> authenticated<br />
• Some faculty worry about the use of online delivery<br />
<strong>for</strong> students who need intrinsic motivation, structure<br />
<strong>and</strong> an encouraging classroom atmosphere, especially<br />
academically fragile students in developmental programs<br />
• Faculty query how lab, field work, practica, <strong>and</strong> other<br />
non-classroom experiences can best be organized in<br />
online courses.<br />
Where such discussions become problematic is where,<br />
in the absence of reliable in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>and</strong> processes <strong>for</strong><br />
assessing equivalence, faculty <strong>and</strong> administrators with<br />
concerns about online learning deny transfer credit to<br />
students who have successfully completed online courses.<br />
In some cases, the accreditation of the institution<br />
delivering the online courses is cited as the reason <strong>for</strong><br />
denying transfer credit. In this scenario, the courses are<br />
often not assessed. Rather, credit is denied on the basis<br />
of where the course was taken, regardless of its quality or<br />
content. Carnevale (2002) outlines the “rude surprise”<br />
awaiting students who try to transfer such courses.<br />
Concerns will always exist about the quality of some<br />
deliverers of courses <strong>and</strong> programs, including online<br />
courses. However, <strong>for</strong> legitimate institutions <strong>and</strong> their<br />
students, it is vital that evaluators can rely on excellent<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation about the online courses <strong>and</strong> can call on<br />
sound principles <strong>and</strong> processes to evaluate them <strong>for</strong><br />
transfer credit. In this transaction, both deliverer <strong>and</strong><br />
evaluators have parts to play. The ultimate beneficiaries<br />
of a sound articulation process, however, are the students,<br />
who can be assured that their learning will be<br />
appropriately recognized. All articulation should, after<br />
all, support the fundamental principles of equity on<br />
which an articulation environment is built: that students<br />
should not have to repeat content which they have already<br />
mastered, nor be denied credit because of technicalities.<br />
Nor should they be credited with learning they<br />
have not acquired, especially if that learning is fundamental<br />
to their advancement to further study, or a required<br />
element of their program (Finlay 2005, p. 7).<br />
Many jurisdictions <strong>and</strong> organizations publish “best<br />
practice” statements <strong>for</strong> online education. For a good<br />
example see the Commission on Institutions of Higher<br />
<strong>Education</strong> (CIHE, no date) Best <strong>Practice</strong>s <strong>for</strong> Electronically<br />
Offered Degree <strong>and</strong> Certificate Programs. Others<br />
provide sets of guidelines exhorting their members to be<br />
fair <strong>and</strong> reasonable. However, most of these documents<br />
provide little guidance as to what “fair <strong>and</strong> reasonable”<br />
actually looks like in practice. Few resources exist that<br />
will assist practitioners at sending institutions to ensure<br />
the successful articulation of their online courses, <strong>and</strong><br />
give the assessors at receiving institutions the tools they<br />
need to make confident decisions. This chapter aims to<br />
fill that gap.<br />
The principles of articulation<br />
When considering how to articulate a course <strong>for</strong> transfer<br />
credit, evaluators are faced with numerous decisions.<br />
Fortunately, they can turn to a number of principles to<br />
guide them as they try to ensure that courses are articulated<br />
fairly <strong>and</strong> consistently. These can be divided into<br />
foundational principles, operating principles, <strong>and</strong> provisional<br />
principles.<br />
FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES<br />
Foundational principles are those which lie at the core of<br />
decisions about all articulation of courses <strong>and</strong> programs.<br />
• Equivalence: Equivalent means “equal in value”. 16 A<br />
course submitted <strong>for</strong> articulation will likely never be<br />
identical to the corresponding course at the receiving<br />
institution. The assessment of equivalence involves<br />
identifying the degree to which it matches in content<br />
or outcomes. Discipline <strong>and</strong> program contexts will<br />
dictate the relative importance of the similarity.<br />
• In lieu: The act of awarding transfer credit implies<br />
the acceptance of a course in place of a course or program<br />
requirement offered at the receiving institution.<br />
The course to be transferred does not have to be<br />
16<br />
Ox<strong>for</strong>d Dictionary.<br />
<strong>Education</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Digital</strong> <strong>World</strong> 183