29.12.2012 Views

3 Fundamentals of press design

3 Fundamentals of press design

3 Fundamentals of press design

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Press safety and certification<br />

– stipulates in the manufacturer’s declaration that the component<br />

complies as far as possible with the ECMD,<br />

– has compiled and archived the required documentation as laid down<br />

by annex V, point 3,<br />

– stipulates the applied safety standards and<br />

– has made reference in the operating instructions to the safety regulations<br />

for the manufacturer <strong>of</strong> the line into which his components are<br />

to be integrated.<br />

All those involved assume that the prescribed minimum statement, as<br />

indicated in annex II B, is insufficient and the machine cannot be commissioned<br />

until the overall line has been proven to comply with the<br />

ECMD. Frequently, and in particular in the case <strong>of</strong> large-scale <strong>press</strong>es,<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the equipment originates from the user and part <strong>of</strong> it from the<br />

purchaser <strong>of</strong> the <strong>press</strong>. As the ECMD requires static stability and safe<br />

access to all points <strong>of</strong> possible intervention, with the declaration <strong>of</strong><br />

conformity the production line manufacturer assumes responsibility<br />

also for the structural work carried out for the <strong>press</strong>, for example the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the necessary foundations. The identity <strong>of</strong> the manufacturer<br />

or construction foreman as defined by ECMD must be contractually<br />

laid down in the case <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> production line. The responsible<br />

party then has the other contractual partners confirm compliance<br />

with health and safety standards to the extent <strong>of</strong> their respective performance.<br />

3.6.4 CE marking<br />

The flow chart in Fig.3.6.3 indicates what is required <strong>of</strong> the manufacturer<br />

wishing to apply the CE mark to his machine. An underlying difference<br />

is drawn between two cases. According to annex IV <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ECMD, <strong>press</strong>es intended for manual feed operation have been classified<br />

as hazardous machines since January 1, 1995. In this case, a C standard<br />

– the EN692 for mechanical and EN693 for hydraulic <strong>press</strong>es – must<br />

exist, and the <strong>press</strong> must be constructed without restrictions in accordance<br />

with this standard. If this is not the case, or if the relevant C standard<br />

does not yet exist, the manufacturer is required to commission a<br />

type test <strong>of</strong> the machine by a notified body (i. e. an appropriate testing<br />

Metal Forming Handbook / Schuler (c) Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!