14.02.2013 Views

Grassmann Algebra

Grassmann Algebra

Grassmann Algebra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TheComplement.nb 5<br />

This axiom is of central importance in the development of the properties of the complement and<br />

interior, inner and scalar products, and formulae relating these with exterior and regressive<br />

products. In particular, it permits us to be able to consistently generate the complements of basis<br />

m-elements from the complements of basis 1-elements, and hence via the linearity axiom, the<br />

complements of arbitrary elements.<br />

We may verify that these are dual formulae by applying the <strong>Grassmann</strong><strong>Algebra</strong> Dual function<br />

to either of them. For example:<br />

��������� � �<br />

Dual�Α � Β �Αm � Βk �<br />

m k<br />

���������<br />

Α � Β ��<br />

� �<br />

Αm � Βk<br />

m k<br />

The forms 5.3 and 5.4 may be written for any number of elements. To see this, let Β �Γ� ∆<br />

k p q<br />

and substitute for Β in expression 5.3:<br />

k<br />

��������������<br />

� ∆ �<br />

����� �����������<br />

Αm � Γp � ∆ �<br />

����� ����� �����<br />

Αm � Γp � ∆q<br />

q<br />

q<br />

Α m � Γ p<br />

In general then, expressions 5.3 and 5.4 may be stated in the equivalent forms:<br />

����������������������<br />

Α � Β � � � Γ �<br />

����� �����<br />

Αm � Βk � � �<br />

�����<br />

Γp<br />

m k p<br />

����������������������<br />

Α � Β � � � Γ �<br />

����� �����<br />

Αm � Βk � � �<br />

�����<br />

Γp<br />

m k p<br />

In <strong>Grassmann</strong>'s work, this axiom was hidden in his notation. However, since modern notation<br />

explicitly distinguishes the progressive and regressive products, this axiom needs to be<br />

explicitly stated.<br />

The complement of a complement axiom<br />

� 4<br />

����� : The complement of the complement of an element is equal (apart from a possible<br />

sign) to the element itself.<br />

����� ����� Φ<br />

Α � ��1� �Αm<br />

m<br />

Axiom 1<br />

����� says that the complement of an m-element is an (nÐm)-element. Clearly then the<br />

complement of an (nÐm)-element is an m-element. Thus the complement of the complement of<br />

an m-element is itself an m-element.<br />

In the interests of symmetry and simplicity we will require that the complement of the<br />

complement of an element is equal (apart from a possible sign) to the element itself. Although<br />

consistent algebras could no doubt be developed by rejecting this axiom, it will turn out to be an<br />

2001 4 5<br />

5.5<br />

5.6<br />

5.7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!