14.02.2013 Views

Grassmann Algebra

Grassmann Algebra

Grassmann Algebra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TheRegressiveProduct.nb 15<br />

It is easy to see that by using the anti-commutativity axiom �10, that the axiom may be<br />

arranged in any of a number of alternative forms, the most useful of which are:<br />

�<br />

�<br />

���Α m � Γ p<br />

����Γ<br />

�p<br />

����<br />

�<br />

�<br />

����Γ<br />

�<br />

� ��� �<br />

�p<br />

k�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

� Α��� �<br />

m�<br />

����Γ<br />

�<br />

� ��� �<br />

�p<br />

k�<br />

����Γ<br />

�p<br />

���Α m � Γ p<br />

�<br />

� Β��� � Γ<br />

k�<br />

p<br />

� Α m � Β k<br />

����<br />

� Γ<br />

� p<br />

m � k � p � n<br />

m � k � p � n<br />

Historical Note<br />

The approach we have adopted in this chapter of treating the common factor relation as an<br />

axiom is effectively the same as <strong>Grassmann</strong> used in his first Ausdehnungslehre (1844) but<br />

differs from the approach that he used in his second Ausdehnungslehre (1862). (See Chapter<br />

3, Section 5 in Kannenberg.) In the 1862 version <strong>Grassmann</strong> proves this relation from<br />

another which is (almost) the same as the Complement Axiom that we introduce in Chapter<br />

5: The Complement. Whitehead [ ], and other writers in the <strong>Grassmann</strong>ian tradition follow<br />

his 1862 approach.<br />

The relation which <strong>Grassmann</strong> used in the 1862 Ausdehnungslehre is in effect equivalent to<br />

assuming the space has a Euclidean metric (his ErgŠnzung or supplement). However the<br />

Common Factor Axiom does not depend on the space having a metric; that is, it is<br />

completely independent of any correspondence we set up between � m and �<br />

n�m . Hence we<br />

would rather not adopt an approach which introduces an unnecessary constraint, especially<br />

since we want to show later that his work is easily extended to more general metrics than the<br />

Euclidean.<br />

Extension of the Common Factor Axiom to general elements<br />

The axiom has been stated for simple elements. In this section we show that it remains valid for<br />

general (possibly non-simple) elements, provided that the common factor remains simple.<br />

Consider two simple elements Α1<br />

m<br />

����Α1<br />

� m<br />

����Α2<br />

� m<br />

�<br />

� ��� �<br />

p�<br />

����Β<br />

�<br />

� ��� �<br />

�k<br />

p�<br />

����Α1<br />

�<br />

� Β � Γ��� � Γ<br />

� m k p�<br />

p<br />

�<br />

� ��� �<br />

p�<br />

����Β<br />

�<br />

� ��� �<br />

�k<br />

p�<br />

����Α2<br />

�<br />

� Β � Γ��� � Γ<br />

� m k p�<br />

p<br />

and Α2 . Then the Common Factor Axiom can be written:<br />

m<br />

Adding these two equations and using the distributivity of � and � gives:<br />

2001 4 5<br />

�����Α1<br />

� m<br />

�Α2<br />

m<br />

�<br />

����� �<br />

p�<br />

����Β<br />

�<br />

� ��� �<br />

�k<br />

p�<br />

�����Α1<br />

� m<br />

�Α2��Β<br />

m k<br />

�<br />

� Γ��� � Γ<br />

p�<br />

p<br />

3.17<br />

3.18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!