Linee Guida COP - Casettagiovanni.it

pingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1995: 64: 486-491.13. Tanahatoe S, Hompes PG, Lambalk CB. Accuracy of diagnostic laparoscopy in the infertility work-upbifore intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2003; 79(2): 361-366.14. Cohlen BJ, Vandekerckhove P, te Velde ER, Habbema JD. Timed intercourse versus intra-uterine inseminationwith or without hyperstimulation for subfertility in men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2): CD000 360.15. Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JP, Schats R, Rutten FF, Schoemaker J. Intra-uterine inseminationor in vitro-fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomized trial and costeffectivenessanalysis. Lancet 2000; 355 (9197): 13-18.16. Campana A, Sakkas D, Stalberg A, Bianchi PG, Comte I, Pache T, Walker D. Intrauterine insemination:evaluation of the results accordino to the woman’s age, sperm qualità, total sperm count per inseminationand life table analysis. Hum Reprod 1996; 11(4): 732-736.17. Berg U, Brucker C, Berg FD. Effect of motile sperm count after swim-up on outcome of intrauterineinsemination. Fertil Steril 1997; 67 (4): 747-750.18. Pasqualotto EB, Daitch JA, Hendin BN, Falcone T, Thomas AJ Jr, Nelson DR, Agarwal A. Relationshipof total motile sperm count and percentage motile sperm to successful pregnancy rates followingintrauterine insemination. J Assist Reprod Genet 1999; 16(9): 476-482.19. Dickey RP, Pyrzak R, Lu PY, Taylor SN, Rye PH. Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successfulintrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm. FertilSteril 1999; 71(4): 684-689.20. van Waart J, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ, Ombelet W. Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterineinsemination (IUI): a structural literature review. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7(5): 495-500.21. Hauser R, Yogev L, Botchan A, Lessing JB, Paz G, Yavetz H. Intrauterine insemination in male factorsubfertility: significance of sperm motility and morphology assessed by strict criteria. Andrologia 2001;33(1): 13-17.22. Marcoux S, Maheux R, Bérubé S. Laparoscopic surgery in infertile women with minimal or mild endometriosis.N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 217-222.23. Gruppo Italiano per lo studio dell’Endometriosi Ablation of lesion vs no treatment in infertile womenwith endometriosis: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod 1999; 14(5): 1332-1334.24. Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tomas C, Bloigu R, Tuomivaara L, Martikainen H. Intrauterine insemination treatmentin subfertility: an analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod 1999; 14 (3); 698-703.25. Singh M, Goldberg J, Falcone T, Nelson D, Pasqualotto E, Attaran M, Agarwal A. Superovulation and intrauterineinsemination in cases of treated mild pelvic disease. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001; 18 (1): 26-29.26. Harlow CR, Cahill DJ, Maile LA, Talbot WM, Mears J, Wardle PG, Hull MG. Reduced preovulatory granulosecell steroidogenesis in women with endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996; 81:426-429.27. Pellicer A, Oliveira N, Ruiz A, Remohí J, Simón C. Exploring the mechanism(s) of endometriosis-relatedinfertilità: an analysis of embryo development and implantation in assisted reproduction. HumReprod 1995; 10 (Suppl 2): 91-97.28. Arici A, Oral E, Bukulmez O, Duleba A, Olive DL, Jones EE. The effect of endometriosis on implantation:results from the Yale University in vitro-fertilization end embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril1996; 65: 603-607.29. Martinez-Roman S, Balasch J, Creus M, Fábregues F, Carmona F, Vilella R, Vanrell JA. Immunologicalfactors in endometriosis-associated reproductive failure: studies in fertile and infertile women withand without endometriosis. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1794-1799.30. Geber S, Paraschos T, Atkinson G, Margara R, Winston RM. Results of IVF in patients with endometriosis:the severity of the disease does not effect outcome, or the incidence of miscarriage. Hum Reprod1995; 10: 1507-1511.31. Buyalos RP. and Agarwal SK. Endometriosis-associated infertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 12(5): 377-381.32. van der Westerlaken LA, Naaktgeboren N, Helmerhorst FM. Evaluation of pregnancy rates after intrauterineinsemination according to indication, age, and sperm parameters. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998;15: 359-364.33. Khalil MR, Rasmussen PE, Erb K, Laursen SB, Rex S, Westergaard LG. Homologous intrauterine insemination.An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles. Acta Obstet GynecolScand 2001; 80: 74-81.160