12.07.2015 Views

Linee Guida COP - Casettagiovanni.it

Linee Guida COP - Casettagiovanni.it

Linee Guida COP - Casettagiovanni.it

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of stones from the urinary tract. J Endourol 2007; 21(11): 1261-70.18. Graber SF, Danuser H, Hochre<strong>it</strong>er WW, Studer UE. A prospective randomized trial comparing 2 l<strong>it</strong>hotripters forstone disintegration and induced renal trauma. J Urol 2003; 169(1): 54-7.19. Villanyi KK, Szekely JG, Farkas LM, Javor E, Pusztai C. Short term changes in renal function after extracorporealshock wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy in children. J Urol 2001; 166(1): 222-4.20. Pishchalnikov YA, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr, Pishchalnikova IV, Vonderhaar RJ. Why stones break better at slowshock wave rates than at fast rates: in v<strong>it</strong>ro study w<strong>it</strong>h a research electrohydraulic l<strong>it</strong>hotripter. J Endourol 2006;20(8): 537-41.21. Yilmaz E, Batislam E, Basar M, Tuglu D, Mert C, Basar H. Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy:prospective randomized study. Urology 2005; 66(6): 1160-4.22. Locke DR, Newman RC, Steinbock GS, Finlayson B. Extracorporeal shock-wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy in horseshoe kidneys.Urology 1990; 35(5): 407-11.23. Jones DJ, Wickham JE, Kellett MJ. Percutaneous nephrol<strong>it</strong>hotomy for calculi in horseshoe kidneys. J Urol1991; 145(3): 481-3.24. Holmes SA, Eardley I, Corry DA, Nockler I, W<strong>it</strong>hfield HN. The use of extracorporeal shock wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy formedullary sponge kidneys. Br J Urol 1992; 70(4): 352-4.25. Grasso M, Loisides P, Beaghler M, Bagley D. The case for primary endoscopic management of upper urinarytract calculi: I. A cr<strong>it</strong>ical review of 121 extracorporeal shock-wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy failures. Urology 1995; 45(3):363-71.26. Murray MJ, Chandoke PS, Berman CJ, Sankey NE. outcome of extracorporeal l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy monotherapy for largerenal calculi: effect of stone and collecting system surface areas and cost effectiveness of treatment. JEndourol 1995; 9(1): 9-13.27. Ackermann D, Claus R, Zehntner CH, Schreiber K. Extracorporeal shock wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy for large renal stones.To what size is extracorporeal shock wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy alone feasible? Eur Urol 1988; 15(1-2): 5-8.28. Burns T, Stein J, Tauber R. Extracorporeal piezoelectric shock wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy as mono- and multiple therapyof large renal calculi including staghorn stones in unanaesthetized patients under semiambulant cond<strong>it</strong>ions.Br J Urol 1995; 75(4): 435-40.29. BalTCi S, Köhle R, Kun<strong>it</strong> G, Joos H, Frick J. Long-term follow-up after extracorporeal shock wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy oflarge kidney stones. Eur urol 1992; 22(2): 106-11.30. Michaels Ek, Fowler JE Jr. ESWL monotherapy for large volume renal calculi: efficacy and morbid<strong>it</strong>y. Urology1989; 34(2): 96-9.31. Bierkens AF, Hendrikx AJ, Lemmens WA, Debruyne FM. Extracorporeal shock wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy for large renalcalculi: the role of ureteral stents. a randomized trial. J Urol 1991; 145(4): 699-702.32. Sulaiman MN, Buchholz NP, Clark PB. The role of ureteral stent placement in the prevention of Steinstrasse.J Endourol 1999; 13(3): 151-5.33. Musa AA. Use of double-J stents prior to shock wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomizedstudy. Int Urol Nephrol 2008; 40(1): 19-22.34. Tiselius HG, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Sarica K, Turk C. Guidelines on urol<strong>it</strong>hiasis. EuropeanAssociation of Urology 2009; pp 1-116; update March 2008.http://www.uroweb.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Guidelines/18%20Urol<strong>it</strong>hiasis.pdf.35. Danuser H, Müller R, Desoeudres B, Dobry E, Studer UE. Extracorporeal shock wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy of lower calyxcalculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system? Eur Urol 2007;52(2): 539-46.36. Srivastava A, Zaman W, Singh V, Mandhani A, Kumar A, Sing U. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsyfor sol<strong>it</strong>ary lower calyceal stone: a statistical model. BJU Int 2004; 93(3): 364-8.37. Ather MH, Abid F, Akhtar S, Khawaja K. Stone clearance in lower pole nephrol<strong>it</strong>hiasis after extracorporeal shockwave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy–the controversy continues. BMC Urol 2003; 3: 1.38. Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, Denstedt JD, Grasso M, Gutierrez-Aceves J, Khan RI, Leveillee RJ,Lingeman JE, Macaluso JN Jr, Munch LC, Nakada SY, Newman RC, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Teichman J,Woods Jr. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsy and percutaneousnephrol<strong>it</strong>hotomy for lower pole nephrol<strong>it</strong>hiasis–in<strong>it</strong>ial results. J Urol 2001; 166(6): 2072-80.39. Sorensen CM, Chandoke PS. Is lower pole calyceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave l<strong>it</strong>hotripsysuccess for primary lower pole kidney stones? J Urol 2002; 168(6): 2377-82.40. Sistla BW, Devasia A, Ganavaj I, Chacko NK, Kekre NS, Gopalarishnan G. Radiographic anatomical factors donot predict clearance of lower calyceal calculus by SWL. Proceedings 22nd World Congress on Endourologyand SWL, India, 2004. J Endourol 2004; 18(S1): abstr 53.289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!