15.06.2015 Views

Dialogkompetens i skolans vardag - Publikationer - LTU - Luleå ...

Dialogkompetens i skolans vardag - Publikationer - LTU - Luleå ...

Dialogkompetens i skolans vardag - Publikationer - LTU - Luleå ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Background<br />

Listening Environment in School 3<br />

In the Swedish school system there is a distinction between schools for the<br />

deaf run by the state and schools for hard-of-hearing pupils run by local<br />

authorities (municipalities). The educational language in schools for the deaf<br />

is sign language, whilst in schools for the hard-of-hearing it is spoken<br />

Swedish. The focus for this study is five local schools that provide classes for<br />

hard-of-hearing pupils. These schools have an average number of seven to<br />

eight pupils per class, and offer acoustically adapted classrooms with<br />

technical equipment, e.g. hearing loops. Two different microphones can be<br />

used with hearing loops: either a wireless and flexible conference system with<br />

the microphone placed in the middle of the table, or an individual<br />

microphone with a locked position at each desk. The desk alternative can<br />

be controlled with a mechanical on/off button (the traditional system) or by<br />

voice (see www.rnid.org.uk). Sign language is taught as a subject once or<br />

twice a week. This is not to be compared with a bilingual situation, since most<br />

of the pupils and teachers are unable to use the language fluently. In classes<br />

for hard-of-hearing pupils there is a need for the use of hearing aids 1 in the<br />

environment as well as, on occasion, the use of signs from sign language in<br />

addition to speaking.<br />

This study originated during the school improvement project mentioned<br />

earlier, in which teachers tried to change the learning environment for<br />

hard-of-hearing pupils in order to promote a more dialogue-oriented<br />

and participatory classroom communication. The traditional technological<br />

solutions had contributed to an inflexible arrangement of furniture in<br />

the classroom. The desks were positioned in the shape of a half circle and<br />

linked together with wires for individual desk microphones. The teacher<br />

used a wireless microphone whilst the desk microphones for the pupils<br />

were supposed to be turned on and off manually when each pupil wished<br />

to speak. When pupils did not activate their microphones, this also<br />

prevented other pupils from listening via the hearing loop. In order<br />

not to risk a misunderstanding, pupils preferred to speak to the teacher<br />

rather than to their classmates, which led to a relatively passive approach<br />

amongst pupils in the classroom (Ahlström & Preisler 1998). One<br />

might say that in such classrooms the teacher significantly controlled<br />

the classroom communication. In a description of the improvement<br />

process mentioned above, a very experienced teacher expressed the following<br />

view:<br />

1 Hearing aids are personal aids that can have three different settings (m, t and m/t).<br />

. Microphone (m)-setting: The microphone of the hearing aid picks up and amplifies the sound<br />

(speech and background sound).<br />

. Telecoil (t)-setting: A hearing loop is used to amplify and transmit to the hearing aid what<br />

pupils close to the desk microphone are saying; the background noise is cut off.<br />

. Microphone/telecoil (m/t)-setting: The microphone and the hearing loop amplify and transmit<br />

the sound at the same time. Very few pupils have this setting on their hearing aid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!