15.06.2015 Views

Dialogkompetens i skolans vardag - Publikationer - LTU - Luleå ...

Dialogkompetens i skolans vardag - Publikationer - LTU - Luleå ...

Dialogkompetens i skolans vardag - Publikationer - LTU - Luleå ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ABSTRACT<br />

Wennergren, Ann-Christine (2007). Dialogue competence in school: An action research<br />

study in learning environments for hard-of-hearing pupils. Luleå University of Technology,<br />

Department of Education. ISSN 1402-1544, ISRN: <strong>LTU</strong>-DT--07/34--SE<br />

In classes for hard-of-hearing pupils there are children and young people with different<br />

degrees of impaired hearing, all of whom need hearing aids and technical equipment in<br />

the environment. The initial problem area of the present thesis concerned the pattern of<br />

communication in the classroom. Previous research has shown that such communication<br />

is strongly affected by the chosen technical solution. The research questions developed<br />

successively from the assumption that it is only the teachers that can change the learning<br />

environment. In order to achieve a combination of scientific results and improvement,<br />

this study has an action research study approach. The overall aim was to illuminate and<br />

describe dialogues between different actors in a national school improvement project.<br />

Actors in the context were teachers, their pupils and the researcher. The thesis is based on<br />

improvement work in which the researcher cooperated with fifty teachers from five<br />

schools located in different parts of Sweden. This work involved parallel processes of<br />

change, for the pupils in the classrooms and for the participating teachers. The thesis<br />

comprises three substudies, two of which are focused on the teachers’ dialogues and one<br />

on the pupils’ listening environments. In the last-mentioned substudy, 165 pupils were<br />

asked to draw and describe their best listening environment at school. The result showed<br />

that the listening role required different environmental conditions, such as a cleaned up<br />

sound environment, visual support, conversation rules and comfortable surroundings. A<br />

central conclusion was that pupils need to be offered opportunities to verbalise their individual<br />

needs in the school environment. The result further showed that the teachers<br />

worked in different ways to improve the learning environment and that they introduced<br />

structures to support the dialogue between pupils. This happened at the same time as the<br />

teachers were trying out tools for their own learning in order to take part in dialogues<br />

with colleagues based on confirmations and challenges. Tools used in the learning processes<br />

were a logbook, shadowing, facilitating and a net-based dialogue. The analyses<br />

showed explicit differences between using the tools and learning through them in the<br />

zone of proximal development. In their improvement processes the teachers depended on<br />

critical friends in order to be challenged as knowledge developers. Difficulties in giving<br />

a balanced response were evident from the net-based forum in which the teachers reported<br />

different attempts at change. The study has drawn on sociocultural perspectives on<br />

learning in which dialogue competence have been central to learning in the classroom and<br />

in the teachers’ occasional communities of practice. The results indicate that teachers, for<br />

their professional improvement, require critical friends in alternative forms of learning<br />

processes and that pupils as actors require alternative listening environments.<br />

Keywords: hard-of-hearing pupils, dialogue competence, critical friends, school improvement,<br />

participatory action research, sociocultural theories

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!