04.03.2013 Views

The Latin Neuter Plurals in Romance - Page ON

The Latin Neuter Plurals in Romance - Page ON

The Latin Neuter Plurals in Romance - Page ON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

113<br />

113<br />

FUNDUS, ARCUS, COLFUS, NODUS, GRADUS, PUTEUS, VADUS, FETUS — we f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

firstly Rum. pl. armuri (with a new s<strong>in</strong>g, armur(e) alongside arm), and ierburi<br />

‘herbs’, ‘small flower<strong>in</strong>g plants’ as the plural of iarbă ‘grass’, ‘herb’. Here<br />

Italian has no -ora forms for either, as far as I have been able to discover, unless<br />

the Lombard <strong>Lat<strong>in</strong></strong> gerboras (“<strong>in</strong>ter gerboras et terra arva”) is this word; ERVUS<br />

appears as lero or learned ervo (and note also the erbo quoted above), but we<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d erbor- or erbol- <strong>in</strong> derivatives of erba such as erborare, and I will discuss<br />

this <strong>in</strong> a m<strong>in</strong>ute. For FUNDUS we have Rum. pl. funduri and Lomb. Lat. fundora;<br />

I have not found such a form quoted from later writ<strong>in</strong>gs, but the extended stem<br />

is seen <strong>in</strong> OIt. sfondolare. In the case of ARCUS we have Rum. pl. arcuri as well<br />

as old arce, Lomb. Lat. arcora, with the same form cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> Old Tuscan,<br />

and for COLFUS the modern Rum. golfuri, which happens to balance the<br />

COLFORA recorded at Ravenna. NODUS is represented by Rum. pl. noduri and<br />

adj. noduros, OTusc. nodora, Calab. nudura, adj. nodoruto (thus lend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

support to the idea of a neuter *NODUS surviv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Gallo-<strong>Romance</strong>), and<br />

GRADUS by Lomb. Lat. and OIt. gradora (Rum. grad, pl. grade, is modern). For<br />

PUTEUS we have Rum. pl. puŃuri, It. dial. pozzora, puzzure, for VADUS Rum. pl.<br />

vaduri and Lomb. Lat. vadora, and for FETUS Lomb. Lat., Neap. fetora (here<br />

Rumanian has masc. făt, pl. feŃi, as <strong>in</strong> Făt Frumos ‘Pr<strong>in</strong>ce Charm<strong>in</strong>g’).<br />

Elsewhere the extended stem of ARMUS is found <strong>in</strong> Sp. enarmorarse<br />

‘rear up’, and then we come to ERVUS, about which Meyer-Lübke has an<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g theory, though this is called <strong>in</strong>to question by Corom<strong>in</strong>as. His idea<br />

(already expressed <strong>in</strong> Schicks.) is that Rum. ierburi, It. erbor- are not org<strong>in</strong>ally<br />

connected with HERBA, but come from 3rd-declension ERVUS, attested <strong>in</strong><br />

Venantius Fortunatus and backed up by Fr., Prov., Cat. ers; Corom<strong>in</strong>as, however,<br />

argues that this last-named form has come from the plural, say<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong><br />

Spanish the pl. yeros is the form normally used. On the other hand, we f<strong>in</strong>d the<br />

root HERBOR- diffused everywhere, It. erbor-, erbol-, Fr. herbor-, herbol-, Prov.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!