04.03.2013 Views

The Latin Neuter Plurals in Romance - Page ON

The Latin Neuter Plurals in Romance - Page ON

The Latin Neuter Plurals in Romance - Page ON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

74<br />

the trees were neuter, with -UM <strong>in</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>gular and -A <strong>in</strong> the plural. But then, as<br />

Lausberg expla<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> detail (§601), the trees generally became mascul<strong>in</strong>e, as did<br />

ARBOR also, while at the same time the formal dist<strong>in</strong>ction <strong>in</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>gular<br />

between mascul<strong>in</strong>e and neuter was becom<strong>in</strong>g lost, so that the names of the tree<br />

and the fruit became the same <strong>in</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>gular; <strong>in</strong> the plural the dist<strong>in</strong>ction<br />

between mascul<strong>in</strong>e -I and neuter -A was ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed, but there was a further<br />

tendency to change the name of the tree to a form <strong>in</strong> -A, <strong>in</strong> keep<strong>in</strong>g with its<br />

fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e gender (so ORNA for ORNUS <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>scription), and to use the neuter<br />

plural of the name of the fruit for the s<strong>in</strong>gular, thus creat<strong>in</strong>g a further k<strong>in</strong>d of<br />

confusion. (An example of the opposite tendency is seen <strong>in</strong> the creation of the<br />

tree-name CASTANEUS, quoted by Grandgent from Gregory of Tours, to form a<br />

contrast with CASTANEA, which had always been a fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e s<strong>in</strong>gular and now<br />

became reserved for the name of the fruit.) Thus <strong>in</strong> late <strong>Lat<strong>in</strong></strong> we can f<strong>in</strong>d either<br />

MELU-, POMU-, PIRU-, MESPILU- or MELA, POMA, PIRA, MESPILA as the names<br />

both of the trees and the fruit (we have already encountered a pl. POME <strong>in</strong> the Gl.<br />

Reich.). This confusion has been cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> <strong>Romance</strong> <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> areas, but has<br />

been obviated <strong>in</strong> most cases by creat<strong>in</strong>g a new name for the tree, generally by<br />

use of the end<strong>in</strong>g -ARIUS or -ARIA (depend<strong>in</strong>g on the gender of the word for<br />

‘tree’). MELU- is cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> Rumanian as măr, mean<strong>in</strong>g ‘apple-tree’ or<br />

‘apple’, with differ<strong>in</strong>g forms <strong>in</strong> the plural follow<strong>in</strong>g the classical dist<strong>in</strong>ction,<br />

meri for the former and mere for the latter (here Istro-Rumanian seems to have<br />

a pl. merur, and a similar perur ‘pears’). Similarly, Old Italian had an<br />

undifferentiated s<strong>in</strong>gular il melo for the tree and the fruit, but differentiated<br />

plurals i meli and le mela, and this situation is cont<strong>in</strong>ued today <strong>in</strong> the southern<br />

dialects. This seems to have been the pattern followed orig<strong>in</strong>ally by all the fruits<br />

<strong>in</strong> Italian (cf. pomo still used for both tree and fruit), and we shall f<strong>in</strong>d that the<br />

old mascul<strong>in</strong>e or neuter s<strong>in</strong>gular forms are also sporadically preserved<br />

elsewhere <strong>in</strong> the case of certa<strong>in</strong> fruits. (<strong>The</strong>re were also a certa<strong>in</strong> number of<br />

fruits which never had a neuter form.)<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!