04.03.2013 Views

The Latin Neuter Plurals in Romance - Page ON

The Latin Neuter Plurals in Romance - Page ON

The Latin Neuter Plurals in Romance - Page ON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

35<br />

35<br />

<strong>in</strong> Chir.) as ‘leaves’? <strong>The</strong> modern languages offer examples of both mean<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong><br />

the s<strong>in</strong>gular, of which ‘foliage’ (found, e.g., <strong>in</strong> phrases correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

similar English ‘<strong>in</strong> leaf’) must surely be the older. In other cases the process of<br />

transference is clear. In that of an abstract noun like GAUDIA, the collective<br />

plural mean<strong>in</strong>g, as <strong>in</strong> “the joys of motherhood” (as contrasted with the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual “Five Joys of the Virg<strong>in</strong>”), is close to that of the s<strong>in</strong>gular, and <strong>in</strong> the<br />

same way the pl. FORTIA ‘mighty deeds’ easily becomes the s<strong>in</strong>g. FORTIA ‘might’,<br />

‘force’, and for the development of SP<strong>ON</strong>SALIA compare English “nuptials” =<br />

“wedd<strong>in</strong>g”. In other cases we know that the s<strong>in</strong>gular use to <strong>in</strong>dicate a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

object developed early, as <strong>in</strong> the case of LABIA, RETIA, TRIBULA, OPERA (but <strong>in</strong><br />

the abstract, not the concrete, sense). In the case of LIGNA, PRATA, CLAUSTRA,<br />

CINDRA, CINISSA, INGUINA, BISATIA, GESTA, CAMPANIA we can clearly see a<br />

collective use, and perhaps so also <strong>in</strong> PRIMA VERA, as ‘the first days of spr<strong>in</strong>g’.<br />

Souter says SARMENTA means ‘twig’, but does not say whether it appears <strong>in</strong> the<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gular. He quotes FATAE, but this may simply be extrapolated from the<br />

FATABUS seen above, <strong>in</strong> which case we may merely have an example of a neuter<br />

plural hav<strong>in</strong>g a fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e oblique case (like OVARUM, OSSARIJM, CULTELLARUM),<br />

though the -ABUS certa<strong>in</strong>ly seems to mark the word as fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e, be<strong>in</strong>g used <strong>in</strong><br />

classical <strong>Lat<strong>in</strong></strong> to dist<strong>in</strong>guish the dat.-abl. of DEAE, FILIAE, ANIMAE from those of<br />

DEI, FILII, ANIMI. <strong>The</strong> phrases quoted by Nyrop show that ARMA had both a<br />

collective and an <strong>in</strong>dividual mean<strong>in</strong>g. It is not stated how MELA, PERSICA, PIRA,<br />

PRUNA, NESPILA and FRAGA are used, but the “pome mire pulchritud<strong>in</strong>is”<br />

gloss<strong>in</strong>g “mala granata” <strong>in</strong> the Gl. Reich. are clearly <strong>in</strong>dividual fruits <strong>in</strong> the<br />

plural, like Fr. pommes (the scribe might well have written “*pomas” for the<br />

nom<strong>in</strong>ative, like “litteras” <strong>in</strong> another gloss). (It must be borne <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that while<br />

many of these examples are relevant to the whole of <strong>Romance</strong>, eg. FOLIA, ARMA,<br />

PRIMA VERA, RETIA, some, like LIGNA, PRATA, GAUDIA, GESTA, only apply to part<br />

of the territory, or even just to one local area, viz. France, and such examples are<br />

only recorded <strong>in</strong> late locally-coloured texts.) In the case of the new s<strong>in</strong>gular

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!