The Latin Neuter Plurals in Romance - Page ON
The Latin Neuter Plurals in Romance - Page ON
The Latin Neuter Plurals in Romance - Page ON
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
76<br />
d) In Old Italian, as we have just noted, we f<strong>in</strong>d an orig<strong>in</strong>al type melo<br />
for both tree and fruit, with separate plurals meli and mela, and similarly pomo<br />
(also a 3rd declension form pome, used by Dante amongst others), pero, pruno,<br />
pesco, with plurals for the fruit (collective like le frutta) poma, pera, pruna<br />
(Rohlfs, §368; presumably also pesca — does the Lombard <strong>Lat<strong>in</strong></strong> PESCORA<br />
belong here?). This situation is cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> northern and southern<br />
Italian dialects, so SCalab. milu, piru, pumu, cerasu for tree and fruit (Rohlfs,<br />
§382); for the fruit the pl. puma is clearly quoted (Bat. & Al., Diz. Etim. It.), and<br />
Rohlfs (§369) speaks of rare occurrences <strong>in</strong> the south of -e forms such as pire<br />
(s<strong>in</strong>g. piru), but otherwise I have found no clear references; Rohlfs only speaks<br />
here <strong>in</strong> general of -a forms be<strong>in</strong>g favoured <strong>in</strong> the south, especially <strong>in</strong> S. Calabria<br />
and Sicily, but later, <strong>in</strong> §643, he specifically quotes pumə and pirə as collectives.<br />
Lausberg (§612) also speaks of the occurrence of a collective s<strong>in</strong>gular <strong>in</strong> -a <strong>in</strong><br />
the south, such as la pera, as an <strong>in</strong>termediate stage between the types uno pero<br />
and una pera for ‘a pear’. (In the northern areas which have the same mascul<strong>in</strong>e<br />
form for both tree and fruit, I take it that words like Pied., Emil. per have<br />
adopted the -I type plural, follow<strong>in</strong>g the general tendency that we have observed<br />
for this area to abandon the -A type.)<br />
<strong>The</strong> most usual type of formation <strong>in</strong> modern Italian is the same as that<br />
<strong>in</strong> Rumanian, and here let me first take the case of the two words melo and<br />
pomo, as they tend to be rival formations, and also the shades of mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />
assumed by pomo are typical of those found <strong>in</strong> the languages we shall deal<br />
with subsequently. <strong>The</strong> first of the two follows the general pattern, that is, melo<br />
(pl. meli) means ‘apple-tree’, and for ‘apple’ we have a fem. mela (pl. mele),<br />
from the old neuter plural, with a similar situation <strong>in</strong> the dialects, so Bol.<br />
meil/meila. In the case of pomo, the standard language, as <strong>in</strong> earlier times, uses<br />
the one form for both tree and fruit, with just one plural, pomi, and we have to<br />
76