27.06.2013 Views

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intellectual ...

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intellectual ...

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intellectual ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ikechukwu Diugwu<br />

articulated and stored in a form that can be transmitted. Thus, explicit knowledge is formal and<br />

systematic knowledge (N<strong>on</strong>aka, 1991), which is dependent <strong>on</strong> norms, attitudes, flow <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> informati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

and ways <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> making decisi<strong>on</strong>s that shape how people deal with <strong>on</strong>e ano<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r.<br />

Irrespective <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> differing views <strong>on</strong> tacit and explicit forms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge, competitive advantage is<br />

determined more by tacit knowledge than by explicit knowledge (Grover and Davenport, 2001),<br />

probably because <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> uniqueness in how things are d<strong>on</strong>e that makes it difficult to copy is ensured by<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge that is resident in individuals that ensures <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Despite <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> differing views, Alavi and<br />

Leidner (2001) note that tacit and explicit forms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge are not two dichotomous states <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

knowledge, but are reciprocally dependent and reinforcing qualities <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge. This reinforces an<br />

earlier view that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> structure necessary to develop and interpret explicit knowledge is built around<br />

tacit knowledge (Polanyi, 1967). The author believes that explicit knowledge c<strong>on</strong>tributes more to<br />

performance improvement in organisati<strong>on</strong>s than tacit knowledge because knowledge can <strong>on</strong>ly bring<br />

about improvement in performance if it has been captured, organised, disseminated, and used<br />

appropriately (Wagner, 2003).<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sequently, learning and knowledge are major means <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> resp<strong>on</strong>ding to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> uncertainties <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

business envir<strong>on</strong>ment (Ant<strong>on</strong>acopoulou, 1999) and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> attainment and sustenance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a competitive<br />

edge over competitors are affected by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> possessi<strong>on</strong> and effective utilisati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> requisite knowledge.<br />

The impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> learning and knowledge <strong>on</strong> survival <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> organisati<strong>on</strong>s is more pr<strong>on</strong>ounced in innovati<strong>on</strong><br />

drive sectors (Terra and Angel<strong>on</strong>i, 2003). This corroborates <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Third Community<br />

Innovati<strong>on</strong> survey which shows that 23% (comprising 35% innovating companies and 13% n<strong>on</strong>innovating<br />

companies) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> industrial companies forged partnerships or alliances for knowledge<br />

acquisiti<strong>on</strong> (Sessi, 2002).<br />

3. The c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> between knowledge and competitive advantage<br />

The attainment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sustainable competitive advantage by an organisati<strong>on</strong> depends <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> recogniti<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge as a strategic resource to be created and harnessed effectively. Fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rmore, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

acquisiti<strong>on</strong> and preservati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> superior performance which ensures competitive advantage depends<br />

<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> available resources and capabilities (Aaker, 1989). This situati<strong>on</strong> depends <strong>on</strong> inherent<br />

knowledge because knowledge resources and capabilities, broadens an understanding <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

peculiarities <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> any business envir<strong>on</strong>ment, and improves <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> individuals and organisati<strong>on</strong>s to<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>d to different circumstances (Sinkula, 1994), and sustain its competitive positi<strong>on</strong> over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir<br />

competitors (Spender and Grant, 1996). The ability to c<strong>on</strong>tinuously acquire, assimilate, disseminate,<br />

share and use knowledge is determinant to success as it leads to innovati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> products, better<br />

product development procedures, improved quality, flexibility in a dynamic market and improved<br />

customer service (Huber, 1991; Senge et al., 1994). The ability to c<strong>on</strong>vert intellectual resources into<br />

a chain <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> services in a form useful for customers differentiates successful enterprises (Quinn, 1992),<br />

and for optimum performance and growth, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is need for organisati<strong>on</strong>s to integrate and share<br />

knowledge (Zack, 1999). Survey result shows that firms believe that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are substantial rewards<br />

from sharing knowledge (Ec<strong>on</strong>omist Intelligence Unit, 2005). The implies that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> establishment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

customer loyalty, improved turn-over, increased pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>it, as well as competitive advantage requires an<br />

ability to recognise changes, identify customer behaviour patterns, and adopt appropriate measures<br />

to address <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se. Although, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ability to understand customers’ needs, and predict changes in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir<br />

behaviour could create a decisive advantage over competitors, this is an area where firms’<br />

knowledge-management capabilities are <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten weakest (Ec<strong>on</strong>omist Intelligence Unit, 2005).<br />

Possessi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> assets does not create sustainable competitive advantage; this comes from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ability<br />

to c<strong>on</strong>trol assets and use <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se to formulate and apply value-enhancing strategies (Barney, 1991;<br />

Wernerfelt, 1984). A firm's ability to create and apply knowledge are key to creating and sustaining its<br />

competitive advantage (Grant, 1996a; N<strong>on</strong>aka, 1994; Teece, 1998, 2000; Teece et al., 1997;<br />

Wernerfelt, 1984, 1995). Liebeskind (1996) attributes this to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fact that competiti<strong>on</strong> has become<br />

more knowledge-based, causing a shift in focus from physical or labour resources to knowledge<br />

resources as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> real sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sustainable competitive advantage. Again, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effective applicati<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge leads to a sustainable competitive advantage (Grant, 1995, 1996b)., and determinants<br />

to successful implementati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> business strategies by organisati<strong>on</strong>s are <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> acquisiti<strong>on</strong> and<br />

development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge (Doz, 1996). In view <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this, in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>temporary global ec<strong>on</strong>omy,<br />

knowledge has become a pre-requisite to achieving a sustainable competitive advantage<br />

(Chakravarthy et al., 2003) and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proper management <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> intellectual capital plays a fundamental<br />

role in improving <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> competitive advantage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> leading organisati<strong>on</strong>s (KPMG, 2000).<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!