27.06.2013 Views

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intellectual ...

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intellectual ...

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intellectual ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Wannapa Pipattanaw<strong>on</strong>g et al.<br />

Regarding <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cept <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Bandura social cognitive <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ory (Bandura 1986), he believed that a pers<strong>on</strong><br />

who manages and implements acti<strong>on</strong>s to achieve goals has a perceived self efficacy with a decisi<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pers<strong>on</strong>'s ability to have self management and behavior necessary to achieve successful goals.<br />

The outcome expectancy is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> belief that individuals evaluate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir behavior leading to acti<strong>on</strong>. The<br />

results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir expected acti<strong>on</strong>s are added incentives that will lead to more positive acti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

According to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> literature, Activity Based Costing (ABC) is a tool to analyze workload to discover<br />

whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r it is suitable for individuals or not. It is usually implemented in business, (Kaplan and<br />

Anders<strong>on</strong> 2007; Dunn (2011) however, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> implementati<strong>on</strong> might be advantageous for BCNC since NIs<br />

complained about time (PBRI 2009; BCNC 2009). Therefore, ABC will help to analyze <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> workload <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> BCNC<br />

NIs and can c<strong>on</strong>trol working time in order to <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fer chances for NIs to c<strong>on</strong>duct research while minimizing<br />

issues related to overwork and time. Udpa (2001) described ABC as an appropriate cost accounting<br />

system to measure and c<strong>on</strong>trol costs under <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> microstatistical episode <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> care paradigm suggested<br />

by Emery (1999). ABC works well because it focuses <strong>on</strong> activities performed to provide services in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

delivery <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> care. Thus, it is not <strong>on</strong>ly possible to accurately cost episodes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> care but also to more<br />

effectively m<strong>on</strong>itor and improve <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> quality <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> care. Under ABC, costs are first traced to activities and<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n traced from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se activities to units <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> episodic care using cost drivers based <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> activity resources.<br />

3. Results<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> in depth interview, results showed that some NIs spent ≥ 200 hours <strong>on</strong> writing research<br />

proposals for each piece <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> research. Despite this, some instructors felt that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir priority should be<br />

teaching and learning (T-L) and c<strong>on</strong>sidered CR as a waste <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> time. Some NIs wished to pursue<br />

fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r study in relati<strong>on</strong> to research training so, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y will understand and know how to begin and<br />

c<strong>on</strong>duct successful research. They wished to learn from NIs who are successful in c<strong>on</strong>ducting<br />

research, especially from executives, who act as good researcher role models. They may know <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir<br />

self-efficacy and could expect <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> learning outcome and will change <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir belief or behavior from<br />

learning and sharing. Detailed results from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ABC program, are shown in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> following secti<strong>on</strong><br />

according to a set <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> key questi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

3.1 Is it true that a lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> time or overload <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> work act as a barrier preventing NIs<br />

from BCNC from c<strong>on</strong>ducting research?<br />

Table 1 reveals that community health nursing instuctors (CHNIs) have more workload than<br />

pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al development instructors (PDIs). It can be seen that CHNIs were 83.33% overworked but<br />

PDIs were overworked by 28.57% which are both higher than TNC standard workload.<br />

Table 1: Comparisi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nursing instructors’ workload<br />

Department<br />

Items Community health nursing<br />

(CHN: n = 6)<br />

Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

development<br />

(PD: n = 7)<br />

Deputy Director: Chief : Lecturer 2 : 2 : 2 1 : 2 : 4<br />

Over loaded work <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Deputy Director: Chief : Lecturer<br />

(percentage)<br />

2 : 2 : 1<br />

(83.33 %)<br />

1: 0 : 1<br />

(28.57 %)<br />

Overhead workload/year (hours) 1,689.39 1,381.72<br />

Minimum.workload (hours) 939.17 764.92<br />

Maximum workload (hours) 2,050.25 2,042.36<br />

Note: Thai Nursing council (TNC) standard workload = 1,500 hours<br />

406

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!