17.08.2013 Views

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 3<br />

Inventory of Major WWTPs and Potential <strong>Industrial</strong> Reuse Demands<br />

Craddock Consulting Engineers 3-11<br />

In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />

WWReuseTM1_Sec 3_final.doc<br />

The Agra Resources Coop is within 2 miles of the Albert Lea WWTP. The Austin<br />

Utilities power facility location is within 5 miles of the WWTP and could be closer<br />

depending on its proximity to the permitted wells.<br />

Factors Influencing Potential <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> Reuse<br />

The majority of the Cedar River watershed is in Ground <strong>Water</strong> Area 2 of the state,<br />

which has a good bedrock aquifer supply and limited water bearing surficial sands<br />

and moderate availability of water in the buried sand aquifers. The southern edge of<br />

the watershed is part of the karst area of Ground <strong>Water</strong> Area 3, where ground water<br />

supplies are strongly linked to surface supplies. Contamination susceptibility varies<br />

over the watershed with a higher potential in the eastern sections and areas of lower<br />

susceptibility interspersed with areas rated with highest susceptibility in the mid- and<br />

western regions of the watershed. Occasional well interferences have been noted, but<br />

the public water supplies have had no problems. The agricultural practices of the area<br />

have led to nitrate contamination which could affect the Prairie du Chien-Jordan<br />

aquifer as well as surficial aquifers. Agricultural drainage wells have polluted deeper<br />

ground water.<br />

Des Moines River<br />

<strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />

There is little permitted water used <strong>for</strong> industrial purposes in the Des Moines River<br />

watershed. Of the 0.66 mgd used in 2004, the majority was <strong>for</strong> agricultural processing<br />

industries, specifically PM Windom, Worthington Rendering, and the City of Heron<br />

Lake. Sand and gravel operations collectively withdrew 0.1 mgd from surface waters<br />

in 2004. Table 3.9a and Figure 3.9a summarize the industrial water use <strong>for</strong> the Des<br />

Moines River watershed. There were no water withdrawals related to power<br />

generator facilities.<br />

In Heron Lake, located southwest of Windom, a 50 million gallon capacity ethanol<br />

plant is under construction and scheduled <strong>for</strong> completion by April 2007. A<br />

wastewater treatment plant expansion has also been bid <strong>for</strong> construction.<br />

WWTPs<br />

There are two municipal WWTPs in this watershed with design capacities greater<br />

than 1 mgd: Windom WWTP and Worthington WWTP. Table 3.9b summarizes the<br />

design capacity and historic flows <strong>for</strong> the plants. These WWTPs, with a design<br />

capacity total of 5.8 mgd, discharged over 3 mgd in 2005. WWTPs in this watershed<br />

with design capacities less than 1 mgd have a combined design capacity of 3.1 mgd.<br />

As with Heron Lake discussed previously and below, smaller WWTPs in proximity to<br />

an industry may be a potential supplier of reclaimed water. With over 30% of the<br />

watershed’s wastewater treatment system capacity in facilities less than 1 mgd, and<br />

the agricultural industry potential in this area, smaller WWTPs should be evaluated<br />

more closely in Task 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!