17.08.2013 Views

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TM3: Recycled <strong>Wastewater</strong> System Components and Costs<br />

<strong>Recycling</strong> <strong>Treated</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Wastewater</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />

facilities to achieve microbial limits to protect public health are discussed under<br />

Section 3.3.<br />

3.3 <strong>Municipal</strong> WWTP Processes and <strong>Water</strong> Quality<br />

3.3.1 Overview<br />

Assumptions were made to define a starting point <strong>for</strong> treatment requirements to meet<br />

regulatory and industrial specific uses of a reclaimed water supply. For this project, it<br />

is assumed that the WWTP is supplying an effluent from a secondary treatment<br />

system. The secondary system is an activated sludge system with nitrification and<br />

phosphorus removal, defined <strong>for</strong> this project as ‘advanced secondary treatment’.<br />

While some Minnesota municipal facilities may have total nitrogen removal or the<br />

capability, the majority do not. Hence, in this study only ammonia nitrogen removal<br />

is assumed under the term ‘advanced secondary treatment’ or when the term nutrient<br />

removal is used.<br />

The majority of Minnesota’s larger WWTPs have an advanced secondary treatment<br />

process or will have this capability as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are<br />

developed across the state. New facilities and major expansions permitted in the state<br />

are anticipated to have nutrient limits that would dictate this assumed process train.<br />

In addition, because one of the largest and most likely industrial uses of reclaimed<br />

water is <strong>for</strong> cooling water, which requires minimal levels of phosphorus and<br />

ammonia – use of an advanced secondary treatment system effluent is an optimum<br />

starting point. This assumption does not exclude consideration of other types of<br />

wastewater treatment facilities <strong>for</strong> water reclamation, such as fixed film systems<br />

(trickling filters and rotating biological contactors), stabilization ponds,<br />

chemical/physical package systems, or natural systems (wetland treatment).<br />

However, it is likely that additional processes would need to be added to meet the<br />

water quality requirements of a specific industry and the regulatory requirements.<br />

3.3.2 Base WWTP Definition and Effluent Quality<br />

A “base level” water quality produced by a “base WWTP” was assumed <strong>for</strong> purposes<br />

of estimating costs of service <strong>for</strong> a municipality to supply an industry with reclaimed<br />

water. The base level reclaimed water quality is defined <strong>for</strong> this study as a hard water<br />

that meets regulatory standards <strong>for</strong> non-contact industrial water uses. The base level<br />

water quality is assumed to have the constituent concentrations listed in Table 6, as<br />

typical of an advanced secondary wastewater facility effluent. This list includes<br />

constituents in most Minnesota NPDES permits (<strong>for</strong> discharge to a receiving water),<br />

those required by the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Title 22 regulations, and others that relate to specific<br />

industrial water uses, such as total dissolved solids (TDS).<br />

If a facility has advanced secondary treatment, the first seven constituents listed in<br />

Table 6 (through fecal coli<strong>for</strong>m) are expected to be included in the facility’s NPDES<br />

permit, with the exception of nitrate. The concentrations listed <strong>for</strong> these seven<br />

parameters are considered “typical” effluent concentrations, based on a review of<br />

Minnesota WWTP discharge reports and typical operations of similar secondary<br />

WWTPs across the U.S. The BOD and TSS concentrations listed are typically less than<br />

18 Craddock Consulting Engineers<br />

In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />

TM3-Component&Costs_0707

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!