17.08.2013 Views

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 3<br />

Inventory of Major WWTPs and Potential <strong>Industrial</strong> Reuse Demands<br />

Craddock Consulting Engineers 3-27<br />

In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />

WWReuseTM1_Sec 3_final.doc<br />

Factors Influencing Potential <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> Reuse<br />

The northern three-quarters of the Mississippi River-Headwaters watershed is in<br />

Ground <strong>Water</strong> Area 4, known <strong>for</strong> good surficial aquifers, less reliable buried sand<br />

aquifers, and a limited supply from the bedrock. Well interference problems have<br />

been experienced in this area. The southern end, in the 7-county metro area through<br />

St. Cloud has a reliable bedrock supply and moderate bearing surficial and buried<br />

sand aquifers. The susceptibility <strong>for</strong> contamination index rates this watershed as<br />

medium to highest in the mid-watershed regions, with low susceptibility areas<br />

interspersed through the north and eastern parts of the watershed. As with the<br />

Minnesota River watershed, ground water supply and quality is highly variable<br />

across the watershed and site-specific conditions must be considered in evaluating the<br />

adequacy of the water supply.<br />

The Mississippi River-Headwaters watershed has similar surface water issues as the<br />

Lower Mississippi River and Minnesota River, particularly in relation to the Lake<br />

Pepin TMDL. Like these two watersheds, the metro area has a tremendous influence<br />

on the quality of the water leaving the watershed. <strong>Municipal</strong> and industrial<br />

dischargers in this watershed will be an integral part of the solution to meeting the<br />

water quality goals downstream.<br />

Missouri River<br />

<strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />

There are only two industries in the Missouri River with a permit to withdraw water.<br />

Both are sand and gravel washing operations that use surface water. In 2004 only one<br />

of these businesses withdrew water <strong>for</strong> an annual average of 0.06 mgd, as shown in<br />

Table 3.13a.<br />

Table 3.13a. <strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong> in the Missouri River <strong>Water</strong>shed<br />

2004 <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong>, mgd<br />

Industry Category Ground <strong>Water</strong> Surface <strong>Water</strong> Total<br />

Sand and Gravel Washing 0.00 0.06 0.06<br />

Total 0.00 0.06 0.06<br />

Source: MDNR, 2004<br />

WWTPs<br />

The Luverne WWTP is the only facility with a capacity greater than 1 mgd and<br />

discharged nearly 0.9 mgd in 2005, as shown in Table 3.13b. The Luverne WWTP is<br />

operating at about 60% of its design capacity. The combined capacity of the smaller<br />

WWTPs in the watershed is 2.0 mgd.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!