17.08.2013 Views

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 3<br />

Inventory of Major WWTPs and Potential <strong>Industrial</strong> Reuse Demands<br />

Craddock Consulting Engineers 3-21<br />

In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />

WWReuseTM1_Sec 3_final.doc<br />

watershed varies from low to high. Surficial sand aquifers have shown nitrate<br />

contamination.<br />

The Minnesota River watershed dischargers will be affected by the TMDL <strong>for</strong> the<br />

Minnesota River and the downstream Lake Pepin TMDL. The agricultural practices<br />

and natural characteristics of this watershed have contributed to making it a<br />

significant contributor to phosphorus and solids loadings at Lake Pepin. This<br />

watershed will be an integral part of the TMDL process and receiving stream<br />

discharge limits could push some municipalities to consider wastewater reuse.<br />

Table 3.11b. WWTPs in the Minnesota River <strong>Water</strong>shed<br />

Design 2005 Ann Flow as %<br />

Capacity, Avg Flow, of Design<br />

Facility Name<br />

mgd mgd Capacity<br />

Fairmont WWTP 3.9 1.595 41%<br />

Granite Falls WWTP 1.111 0.477 43%<br />

Madelia WWTP 1.31 0.907 69%<br />

Mankato WWTP 11.25 6.861 61%<br />

Marshall WWTP 4.5 2.5180 56%<br />

Met Council - Blue Lake WWTP 37 28.420 77%<br />

Met Council - Seneca WWTP 38 23.353 60%<br />

Montevideo WWTP 3.0 1.083 36%<br />

New Prague WWTP 1.378 0.662 48%<br />

New Ulm WWTP 6.77 2.582 38%<br />

St James WWTP 2.960 1.032 35%<br />

St Peter WWTP 4.0 1.170 29%<br />

Waseca WWTP 3.5 1.580 45%<br />

Wells Easton Minnesota Lake WWTP 1.088 0.516 47%<br />

Winnebago WWTP 1.7 0.592 35%<br />

Total<br />

Source: MPCA, 2005<br />

122.47 73.348 60%<br />

Note: Willmar WWTP discharges into the Minnesota River, but the facility resides in the Mississippi River-Headwaters. It is<br />

included with Mississippi River-Headwaters watershed summary.<br />

Mississippi River-Headwaters (Upper)<br />

<strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />

The Mississippi River-Headwaters or Upper Mississippi River watershed has the<br />

most diverse set of potential reuse industries, as shown in Table 3.12a and Figures<br />

3.12a and 3.12b. Cooling water, mainly <strong>for</strong> once-through systems <strong>for</strong> steam power and<br />

nuclear power facilities, is the dominant use of water by industries, totaling about 800<br />

mgd. The largest water users, outside of the power generation industry, are <strong>for</strong> pulp<br />

and paper processing at Blandin Paper Company, Grand Rapids and International<br />

Paper Company, St. Cloud. However, since both use Mississippi River water and the<br />

municipality’s use river water as their source, there is no added benefit to the ground<br />

water supply systems in those communities if they were reclaimed water customers.<br />

Agricultural processing industries were the largest user of ground water, using 6.5<br />

mgd in 2004. Metal processing, petroleum/chemical processing, and smaller pulp &<br />

paper facilities withdrew around 2 mgd each from the local aquifers in 2004.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!