17.08.2013 Views

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 3<br />

Inventory of Major WWTPs and Potential <strong>Industrial</strong> Reuse Demands<br />

Flint Hills Resources is the largest non-power related industrial water user in this<br />

watershed. Approximately 7 mgd was pumped from its well field in 2004 <strong>for</strong> its total<br />

facility use. They are in the process of system modifications to reuse their process<br />

water rather than add an additional well. <strong>Municipal</strong> WWTP effluent use at Flint Hills<br />

Resources was evaluated during the facility planning stages of the Met Council’s<br />

Empire WWTP expansion; the outfall <strong>for</strong> this plant will be moved to discharge into<br />

the Upper Mississippi River watershed and will be within 2 miles of Flint Hills<br />

Resources. While earlier discussions on reclaimed water from Empire were not<br />

pursued because of water quality issues, notably high chlorides in the Empire WWTP<br />

effluent, it is possible that potential future Flint Hills Resources expansions could<br />

consider this source. Also, the industrial areas along the outfall could benefit from this<br />

potential 24 mgd source of reclaimed water. More detailed investigations of this area<br />

will be conducted in Task 2.<br />

Factors Influencing Potential <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> Reuse<br />

The majority of the Lower Mississippi River watershed has a good bedrock source<br />

water supply that most communities rely on as their primary water source. Most of<br />

the watershed is in Ground <strong>Water</strong> Area 3 of the state, with eastern regions in Area 2<br />

and the northern reaches in Area 1. All three areas have a reliable and productive<br />

bedrock aquifer.<br />

Area 3 has extensive near-surface karst areas that result in aquifers being vulnerable<br />

to contamination. There is wide-spread nitrate contamination in near-surface aquifers<br />

as well occurrences of pesticides and other contaminants. The susceptibility to<br />

contamination index places this watershed in the medium to highest range. Area 2 on<br />

the western edge of the watershed has a more productive buried sand aquifer, but<br />

still limited surficial sand aquifers. The northern watershed, in Area 1, has a reliable<br />

supply <strong>for</strong> all three general aquifer levels.<br />

Portions of the Lower Mississippi River watershed will be affected by the TMDL <strong>for</strong><br />

Lake Pepin. The planning process on this TMDL has established preliminary targets<br />

of phosphorus and solids loading reductions of one-half into Lake Pepin. While<br />

nonpoint sources are significant contributions to this load, it is likely that most point<br />

sources will be considered <strong>for</strong> loading reductions.<br />

Minnesota River<br />

<strong>Industrial</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong><br />

With the exception of water <strong>for</strong> once through cooling of Xcel Energy’s power plant,<br />

industrial water use in the watershed is dominated by the demands of the agricultural<br />

processing industry. As shown in Figures 3.11a and 3.11b and Table 3.11a, over 60%<br />

of the ground water withdrawals were <strong>for</strong> agricultural processing facilities. While the<br />

watershed houses a diverse set of industries, most of the other industries have fairly<br />

small demands.<br />

3-18 Craddock Consulting Engineers<br />

In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />

WWReuseTM1_Sec 3_final.doc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!