17.08.2013 Views

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

Recycling Treated Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Water Use

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 3<br />

Inventory of Major WWTPs and Potential <strong>Industrial</strong> Reuse Demands<br />

WWTPs<br />

There are two municipal WWTPs in this watershed with design capacities greater<br />

than 1 mgd: Chisago Lakes Joint STC and Metro Council’s St. Croix Valley WWTP.<br />

Table 3.16b summarizes the design capacity and historic flows <strong>for</strong> the plant. These<br />

WWTPs discharged 3.9 mgd in 2005. There are also smaller WWTPs that discharge to<br />

surface waters with a combined design capacity of 5.2 mgd.<br />

Table 3.16b. WWTPs in the St. Croix River <strong>Water</strong>shed<br />

Facility Name<br />

Design<br />

Capacity,<br />

mgd<br />

2005 Ann<br />

Avg Flow,<br />

mgd<br />

Flow as % of<br />

Design<br />

Capacity<br />

Chisago Lakes Joint STC<br />

Met Council - St Croix Valley<br />

1.26 0.756 60.0%<br />

WWTP 4.5 3.126 69.5%<br />

Total<br />

Source: MPCA, 2005<br />

5.76 3.882 67.4%<br />

Industries and Proximity to WWTPs<br />

Figure 3.16c presents the location of the industries and WWTPs in the St. Croix River<br />

watershed. Table 3.16c lists the various industries and their distance from the closer of<br />

the two WWTPs. The sand and gravel companies are all located a considerable<br />

distance from a WWTP, the closest is 5 miles away. Andersen Corporation, which<br />

used approximately 0.6 mgd of ground water in 2004, is within 1 mile of the Met<br />

Council St. Croix Valley WWTP. The Xcel Energy facility is also within 1 mile of this<br />

WWTP.<br />

Factors Influencing Potential <strong>for</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> Reuse<br />

This watershed resides in Ground <strong>Water</strong> Area 1 of the state, which has a good<br />

bedrock aquifer supply and moderate bearing surficial sand and buried sand aquifers.<br />

As development continues around the metro area, supply pressures will be placed on<br />

ground water resources in the metro area and fringe areas to the north. <strong>Water</strong> quality<br />

has not been an issue, in general, <strong>for</strong> this area. The St. Croix supply as a surface water<br />

is superior to other major waterways of the area. Low-level contamination of upper<br />

aquifers has occurred from spills and general effects of urbanization. Areas<br />

developing with private individual sewage treatment systems (ISTSs) or clustered<br />

systems have the increased risk of nitrate and pathogen contamination.<br />

Rapid population growth and accompanying land-use changes have affected the<br />

water resources of the St. Croix River Basin. The St. Croix Basin <strong>Water</strong> Resources<br />

Planning Team (St. Croix Basin Team), working with recently completed nutrient and<br />

sediment research, has recommended a 20-percent reduction in total phosphorus<br />

loading within the St. Croix Basin. This is based on a 39-percent projected population<br />

growth in the St. Croix Basin by the year 2020. The St. Croix basin will also be part of<br />

the Lake Pepin TMDL which is projected to require a 50% reduction in solids and<br />

phosphorus loads from upstream sources.<br />

3-36 Craddock Consulting Engineers<br />

In Association with CDM & James Crook<br />

WWReuseTM1_Sec 3_final.doc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!