13.11.2014 Views

Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE

Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE

Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Florentino Portero Rodríguez<br />

development of a system of blocs which lasted until the fall of the Berlin<br />

Wall and the dissolution of the Soviet Union. These blocs disappeared<br />

once the exceptional circumstances did. The new international society<br />

is characterised and will continue to be characterised by a more closewoven<br />

network of organisations that are very different in nature. States<br />

need to organise themselves more than ever to address the challenge of<br />

globalisation and interdependence. To this end they have organisations<br />

that date from the past and now face the challenge of adapting to a new<br />

international environment. Together with them others will emerge from the<br />

urgent need to find responses to the problems of our time. We are therefore<br />

not dealing with a Cartesian design. Only a war disaster would allow<br />

a coherent design to emerge from the ruins of the old organisations. If we<br />

succeed in avoiding a major war the map of the international institutions<br />

will grow chaotically but pragmatically until the conditions are in place for<br />

a general agreement allowing it to be simplified.<br />

A global world is not an integrated world. We are interdependent to a<br />

degree never witnessed before; our cultures are mutually influential; and<br />

we know more about each other than in earlier times… yet we continue<br />

to be different and geography continues to play a crucial role. A global<br />

world entails a larger number of actors on the stage and, accordingly,<br />

greater complexity. The United States will continue to be the «hyperpower»,<br />

the only state with interests throughout the planet and the ability<br />

to act—be it diplomatically, commercially or militarily—anywhere in the<br />

world. Russia has not managed to develop either a modern economic<br />

system or a democracy. High energy prices have enabled it to knock<br />

its accounts into shape but it has not succeeded in consolidating an<br />

attractive national project. The most obvious proof is its demographics.<br />

Russia’s population continues to shrink and its average life expectancy,<br />

of less than sixty, indicates that we are dealing with a depressed society.<br />

Unless a major change occurs, Russia will continue to suffer from its old<br />

problems in the future: inability to join the developing world and difficulty<br />

of defending borders that are out of proportion to the existing population.<br />

Neither France nor the United Kingdom has sufficient critical mass to be<br />

an actor on the global stage. Both would need to bring Europe around to<br />

their own viewpoints, but cultural differences and the weight of Germany,<br />

which is inclined towards pacifism and non-intervention, will make such<br />

a manoeuvre difficult. Japan is an economic power that is perfectly integrated<br />

into the world economy. It was the first of the great cultures of the<br />

India-Pacific area to understand and join in the process of modernisation.<br />

Its international status was determined by its being a loser in the Second<br />

— 109 —

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!