Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE
Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE
Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Florentino Portero Rodríguez<br />
development of a system of blocs which lasted until the fall of the Berlin<br />
Wall and the dissolution of the Soviet Union. These blocs disappeared<br />
once the exceptional circumstances did. The new international society<br />
is characterised and will continue to be characterised by a more closewoven<br />
network of organisations that are very different in nature. States<br />
need to organise themselves more than ever to address the challenge of<br />
globalisation and interdependence. To this end they have organisations<br />
that date from the past and now face the challenge of adapting to a new<br />
international environment. Together with them others will emerge from the<br />
urgent need to find responses to the problems of our time. We are therefore<br />
not dealing with a Cartesian design. Only a war disaster would allow<br />
a coherent design to emerge from the ruins of the old organisations. If we<br />
succeed in avoiding a major war the map of the international institutions<br />
will grow chaotically but pragmatically until the conditions are in place for<br />
a general agreement allowing it to be simplified.<br />
A global world is not an integrated world. We are interdependent to a<br />
degree never witnessed before; our cultures are mutually influential; and<br />
we know more about each other than in earlier times… yet we continue<br />
to be different and geography continues to play a crucial role. A global<br />
world entails a larger number of actors on the stage and, accordingly,<br />
greater complexity. The United States will continue to be the «hyperpower»,<br />
the only state with interests throughout the planet and the ability<br />
to act—be it diplomatically, commercially or militarily—anywhere in the<br />
world. Russia has not managed to develop either a modern economic<br />
system or a democracy. High energy prices have enabled it to knock<br />
its accounts into shape but it has not succeeded in consolidating an<br />
attractive national project. The most obvious proof is its demographics.<br />
Russia’s population continues to shrink and its average life expectancy,<br />
of less than sixty, indicates that we are dealing with a depressed society.<br />
Unless a major change occurs, Russia will continue to suffer from its old<br />
problems in the future: inability to join the developing world and difficulty<br />
of defending borders that are out of proportion to the existing population.<br />
Neither France nor the United Kingdom has sufficient critical mass to be<br />
an actor on the global stage. Both would need to bring Europe around to<br />
their own viewpoints, but cultural differences and the weight of Germany,<br />
which is inclined towards pacifism and non-intervention, will make such<br />
a manoeuvre difficult. Japan is an economic power that is perfectly integrated<br />
into the world economy. It was the first of the great cultures of the<br />
India-Pacific area to understand and join in the process of modernisation.<br />
Its international status was determined by its being a loser in the Second<br />
— 109 —