13.11.2014 Views

Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE

Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE

Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vicente Garrido Rebolledo<br />

It was attempted to remedy this vagueness in 1995 at the NPT Review and<br />

Extension Conference, which we will go on to deal with.<br />

Despite the criticism levelled at the NPT for its discriminatory nature,<br />

there is no denying the decisive contribution it has made to the containment<br />

of the uncontrolled proliferation of nuclear weapons for the past forty<br />

years. Apart from the nuclear powers, only India, Pakistan and South Africa<br />

have successfully exploded an atomic bomb. Only three states, none of<br />

which is a Party to the NPT, currently have sufficient nuclear capability to<br />

manufacture nuclear weapons: India, Israel and Pakistan. North Korea is<br />

the only state that has withdrawn from the NPT (after announcing it had<br />

sufficient nuclear capability to build several atomic bombs) and, despite<br />

having conducted two nuclear tests (9 October 2006 and 25 May <strong>2009</strong><br />

respectively), its status as a nuclear power has always been debatable. As<br />

for Iran, despite international suspicions about the dual nature (civilian and<br />

military) of its nuclear programme, coupled with repeated complaints of its<br />

failure to cooperate with the IAEA in providing complete information about<br />

this programme, there is currently no clear evidence of its nuclear military<br />

capability. Should this capability materialise, it would have an extremely<br />

worrying «domino effect» in the region and would question the NPT’s efficiency<br />

at preventing future cases of proliferation.<br />

All in all, with the exception of the above cases, it may be said that the<br />

current situation constitutes a considerable success for the Treaty bearing<br />

in mind that, when it was signed in 1968, forecasts predicted that some<br />

two dozen countries would have access to nuclear weapons by the end<br />

of the 1980s. South Africa is the first example of a state which, having<br />

acquired a nuclear capability of its own after the entry into force of the<br />

NPT, chose voluntarily to decommission its nuclear arsenal and subject<br />

its civilian nuclear programme to the international inspections provided<br />

for in the Treaty. In the 1990s the NPT was reinforced as a result of the<br />

implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 (1991)<br />

condemning Iraq for repeated non-compliance with the NPT, obliging it to<br />

dismantle its military nuclear programme and place all its nuclear installations<br />

under the control of the IAEA, which was responsible for verifying the<br />

commitments adopted by states under the NPT.<br />

In 1993 the director of the IAEA stated that the programme had been<br />

fully decommissioned and there were no indications of Iraq «having retained<br />

any physical capability for the indigenous production of weapon-usable<br />

nuclear material». It was the first time in the history of the nuclear nonproliferation<br />

regime that the Security Council gave its unanimous support<br />

— 195 —

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!