Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE
Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE
Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Vicente Garrido Rebolledo<br />
task that Obama sat beneath the Russian flag and Medvedev beneath that<br />
of the US (51).<br />
The Russian side stressed the presidents’ promise to have the text of<br />
the new treaty ready «in the visible future, within a short time», but they<br />
have refused to set specific deadlines, recalling that the START Treaty of<br />
1991 had taken two years to draft. «Our positions are close, and the negotiated<br />
matters, finalised. There are technical details that need finalising.<br />
I hope we can do so in a short time», pointed out Sergei Prikhodko, the<br />
Kremlin’s advisor in the negotiations. On 21 December <strong>2009</strong> the Russian<br />
foreign ministry confirmed that Russia and the US had practically completed<br />
the drafting of the new treaty. «To finalise the last details of the<br />
agreement and present it to the Russian and US presidents for signature,<br />
several problems need to be sorted out… Negotiations will continue in<br />
January <strong>2010</strong>», stated an official document (52).<br />
A substantial reduction in both states’ nuclear arsenals has thus been<br />
agreed on, but the broad range of possibilities, particularly with respect to<br />
the number of delivery vehicles, shows that there is still a noticeable gap<br />
between the intentions of each party. The US government wishes to focus<br />
on curtailing the nuclear warheads currently ready to be fired. Russia is<br />
insisting on a bigger cut in the number of vehicles, as it considers that the<br />
US has a greater capacity to store warheads that would not contravene<br />
the agreement, and to subsequently assemble them if required. The main<br />
discussion point is precisely the number of delivery vehicles, as the US is<br />
not prepared to reduce them to 500, as Russia wants. In addition, when<br />
it comes to making counts of nuclear loads, Moscow wants them to be<br />
counted according to the maximum number of warheads each missile<br />
can carry, even if at the time it has only one warhead. Moscow fears that<br />
the nuclear loads disassembled and stored by Washington may again be<br />
rapidly deployed in the event of an outburst of tension between the two<br />
powers (53).<br />
(51) «Moscú y Washington cerrarán en <strong>2010</strong> el nuevo tratado de desarme nuclear»,<br />
Agencia EFE, 19 December <strong>2009</strong>, http://www.google.com/hostednews/epa/article/<br />
ALeqM5hT1Su2cGyj_g1KZUBmTx0uqFO_2w.<br />
(52) «Cancillería rusa confirma que la preparación del nuevo Tratado START está prácticamente<br />
concluida», RIA Novosti, Moscow, 21 December <strong>2009</strong>, http://sp.rian.ru/onlinenews/<strong>2009</strong>1221/124440269.html.<br />
(53) For the contents of and developments in the negotiations for the new treaty see the<br />
report drafted for the members of US Congress, which is periodically updated, WOOLF,<br />
Amy F., <strong>Strategic</strong> Arms Control After START: Issues and Options, CRS Report for<br />
Congress, Congressional Research Service, R40084, 9 October <strong>2009</strong>, http://www.fas.<br />
org/sgp/crs/nuke/R40084.pdf.<br />
— 209 —