Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE
Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE
Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The global recession and its impact on international economic relations<br />
nationalism. Paradoxically, all countries became poorer in the attempt to<br />
protect themselves from poverty.<br />
While awaiting confirmation that the errors of the past are not being<br />
repeated, we may draw a few lessons. The first is that the discipline imposed<br />
by the WTO has been fairly useful in putting a brake on protectionism.<br />
It is allowing tariffs to be raised only as far as the established ceilings and<br />
not above them. It is also granting governments the possibility of resorting<br />
to different safeguard clauses that were designed as escape valves for<br />
situations such as the present and enable countries to temporarily relax<br />
their trade policies without being forced to withdraw from the institution.<br />
These clauses provide temporary protection and are eliminated when the<br />
established period has elapsed, and it is therefore not necessary to start<br />
from scratch in liberalising trade in the good in question.<br />
Another sign of the importance and effectiveness of the WTO is that it<br />
is precisely non-members (like Russia and Algeria) which are hampering<br />
the international free movement of goods, services and investments the<br />
most. We also find that in areas where the coverage of WTO regulations is<br />
limited or non-existent (financial system bail outs, programmes of public<br />
purchases, export subsidies and entry restrictions on workers) more measures<br />
against free trade are being implemented. International regulation<br />
needs to be strengthened in these areas.<br />
Lastly, it should be stressed that the WTO is doing the important job of<br />
overseeing the trade policies of its member states; this is particularly significant<br />
bearing in mind the lack of transparency that usually accompanies<br />
non-tariff barriers. Since the crisis erupted it has published several reports<br />
monitoring all the protectionist measures fostered by governments and<br />
has created a database with the tariff levels of its member states. All this<br />
information is freely available on its website (www.wto.org). In addition the<br />
website www.globaltradealert.org also monitors the protectionist measures<br />
implemented by countries.<br />
But not everything can be attributed to the WTO’s skills. The very dynamic<br />
of globalisation has modified the political economics of protectionism.<br />
On the one hand, considerably fewer workers are employed in farming and<br />
the traditional manufacturing sector today than in the 1930s, and there is<br />
consequently less protectionist pressure. But in addition, although governments<br />
continue to come up against pressure from lobbies that hinder<br />
imports, other pressure groups have sprung up which oppose the closing<br />
of borders. They are chiefly multinationals that import intermediate goods<br />
— 42 —