13.11.2014 Views

Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE

Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE

Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Florentino Portero Rodríguez<br />

The India-Pacific area is characterised by its heterogeneousness, lack<br />

of cohesion and huge potentiality. This potentiality is evident from the<br />

waves of democratisation the region has experienced. Insofar as these<br />

age old cultures have realised the advisability of developing representative<br />

regimes, establishing the rule of law and opening up their markets, economic<br />

and social development has been obvious. This explains why since<br />

the 1980s we have been hearing insistent talk of how the centre of the planet<br />

would shift to this region, an idea that finds no opposition today. This<br />

cultural and political variety is also going to characterise the future. The<br />

challenges faced by some of these states, such as India and China, are<br />

so huge that we should not rule out the possibility of major crises of social<br />

or national cohesion that will determine their political future. Perhaps the<br />

risks are greater in China owing to the havoc wrought by communism on<br />

its culture and traditional values and the absence of legitimate representative<br />

institutions to channel the inevitable tension caused by this deep and<br />

fast transformation.<br />

Since the end of the Cold War we have been witnessing a realignment<br />

which was preceded by the thaw in relations between communist China<br />

and the United States. Not only has communism in its different versions<br />

failed as an alternative for development and security; so too has the Nonaligned<br />

Movement also ceased to be a significant point of reference. The<br />

acceptance and consequence success of the system of open economies<br />

has become both a basis for regional development and an outstanding<br />

nucleus of cohesion. Trade unites; it generates common interests and<br />

shared visions. Never before has there been such interrelationship between<br />

states and economies in this vast region. Relations are growing,<br />

just as a certain regional identity is emerging. Seminars on security and<br />

defence are increasing in number and interest; research institutions<br />

with varying degrees of connection with governments are growing and<br />

analyses of the region’s problems and how to address them are accordingly<br />

becoming more sophisticated. The old regional organisations have<br />

become outdated and are undergoing an overhaul or reform process that<br />

is already underway. There is an overall awareness that this new stage<br />

entails complex security challenges, the management of which requires<br />

intense dialogue between the regional powers.<br />

The first of these problems is nationalism in general and that of China<br />

in particular. The India-Pacific area is home to extremely ancient cultures<br />

which are the pride of their populations. There appears to be no intention<br />

of banishing this sentiment; on the contrary, there is evidence of a certain<br />

— 101 —

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!