Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE
Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE
Strategic Panorama 2009 - 2010 - IEEE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Florentino Portero Rodríguez<br />
The India-Pacific area is characterised by its heterogeneousness, lack<br />
of cohesion and huge potentiality. This potentiality is evident from the<br />
waves of democratisation the region has experienced. Insofar as these<br />
age old cultures have realised the advisability of developing representative<br />
regimes, establishing the rule of law and opening up their markets, economic<br />
and social development has been obvious. This explains why since<br />
the 1980s we have been hearing insistent talk of how the centre of the planet<br />
would shift to this region, an idea that finds no opposition today. This<br />
cultural and political variety is also going to characterise the future. The<br />
challenges faced by some of these states, such as India and China, are<br />
so huge that we should not rule out the possibility of major crises of social<br />
or national cohesion that will determine their political future. Perhaps the<br />
risks are greater in China owing to the havoc wrought by communism on<br />
its culture and traditional values and the absence of legitimate representative<br />
institutions to channel the inevitable tension caused by this deep and<br />
fast transformation.<br />
Since the end of the Cold War we have been witnessing a realignment<br />
which was preceded by the thaw in relations between communist China<br />
and the United States. Not only has communism in its different versions<br />
failed as an alternative for development and security; so too has the Nonaligned<br />
Movement also ceased to be a significant point of reference. The<br />
acceptance and consequence success of the system of open economies<br />
has become both a basis for regional development and an outstanding<br />
nucleus of cohesion. Trade unites; it generates common interests and<br />
shared visions. Never before has there been such interrelationship between<br />
states and economies in this vast region. Relations are growing,<br />
just as a certain regional identity is emerging. Seminars on security and<br />
defence are increasing in number and interest; research institutions<br />
with varying degrees of connection with governments are growing and<br />
analyses of the region’s problems and how to address them are accordingly<br />
becoming more sophisticated. The old regional organisations have<br />
become outdated and are undergoing an overhaul or reform process that<br />
is already underway. There is an overall awareness that this new stage<br />
entails complex security challenges, the management of which requires<br />
intense dialogue between the regional powers.<br />
The first of these problems is nationalism in general and that of China<br />
in particular. The India-Pacific area is home to extremely ancient cultures<br />
which are the pride of their populations. There appears to be no intention<br />
of banishing this sentiment; on the contrary, there is evidence of a certain<br />
— 101 —