Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language
Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language
Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Food <strong>and</strong> smell 199<br />
name krauts). The smell <strong>of</strong> garlic (so distinctive it has its own adjective<br />
alliaceous) provides <strong>the</strong> basis for several ethnic <strong>and</strong> racial insults. 50<br />
As with our food tastes, very little <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> way we react to smells seems to<br />
be biological. Typically, it depends on <strong>the</strong> associations that a smell has for<br />
us as to whe<strong>the</strong>r we find it agreeable or disagreeable. So why are we so<br />
uneasy about smells – why <strong>the</strong> taboos? Perhaps it is simply that we like to<br />
st<strong>and</strong> alo<strong>of</strong> from our animal origins, <strong>and</strong> this sense doesn’t let us. We can<br />
shut our eyes, we can cover our ears, but we cannot stop breathing <strong>and</strong> when<br />
we brea<strong>the</strong> we take in odours. More than any o<strong>the</strong>r sense, our ability to<br />
smell reminds us that, as much as we like to deny it, we are animals. We all<br />
have our own odour-producing gl<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> when we try to mask <strong>the</strong>ir smell<br />
with perfumes <strong>and</strong> deodorants we cannot overcome <strong>the</strong> fact that each person<br />
smells different.<br />
Ambivalence is part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> human condition, unavoidable in a species struggling to<br />
reconcile <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> an advanced brain in <strong>the</strong> scented body <strong>of</strong> a naked ape.<br />
(Watson 2000: xii)<br />
Distaste for <strong>the</strong> body <strong>and</strong> its effluvia goes back a long way. Christian<br />
teaching maintained that human life was only a temporary stage in what<br />
was seen as a journey towards a much better future existence. Therefore<br />
only <strong>the</strong> soul was worthy <strong>of</strong> attention, <strong>and</strong> any attempt to prolong life was<br />
deemed irreverent. The body was just too base a thing to be <strong>of</strong> any<br />
importance <strong>and</strong> was certainly not <strong>the</strong> affair <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pious, some <strong>of</strong> whom<br />
went to extraordinary lengths to uphold this belief; <strong>the</strong>re are even records <strong>of</strong><br />
people canonized solely on account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>y did not wash. 51<br />
However, it seems our queasiness about smells <strong>and</strong> smelling has endured, to<br />
<strong>the</strong> extent that natural body odours are now subject to some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most<br />
stringent <strong>of</strong> taboos, particularly when it comes to women’s procreative<br />
organs. So-called personal hygiene products explicitly target women – <strong>the</strong>re<br />
are no male-oriented sprays to complement <strong>the</strong> array <strong>of</strong> feminine sprays<br />
(vaginal deodorants) currently on <strong>the</strong> market.<br />
A memorable figure in any discussion <strong>of</strong> smelling would have to be Patrick<br />
Süskind’s creation, Jean-Baptiste Grenouille, <strong>the</strong> grotesque character in his<br />
novel Perfume: The Story Of A Murderer. Grenouille’s remarkable gift was<br />
his extraordinary sense <strong>of</strong> smell. Described as ‘<strong>the</strong> finest nose in Paris’, <strong>and</strong><br />
capable <strong>of</strong> nuancing hundreds <strong>of</strong> thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> different odours, Grenouille<br />
could differentiate objects by smell far more keenly <strong>and</strong> more precisely than<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs could do by sight. For Grenouille, <strong>the</strong> mismatch between his rich world<br />
<strong>of</strong> smells <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> poverty <strong>of</strong> his language was particularly acute. The French<br />
language proved totally inadequate for his intense olfactory experiences, even<br />
those he encountered on a day-to-day basis. ‘Why should smoke possess only<br />
<strong>the</strong> name “smoke”’, he complained. ‘Why should earth, l<strong>and</strong>scape, air – each