Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language
Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language
Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
36 <strong>Forbidden</strong> <strong>Words</strong><br />
So, defining <strong>the</strong> boundaries <strong>of</strong> taste is controversial. Never<strong>the</strong>less, when we<br />
describe an expression as an orthophemism or euphemism or dysphemism<br />
without making reference to <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> its use, it is <strong>the</strong> middle-class<br />
politeness criterion (MCPC) that we have in mind.<br />
By our definition <strong>of</strong> dysphemism, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> language in <strong>the</strong> following<br />
quote would count as dysphemistic, i.e. <strong>of</strong>fensive. Although <strong>the</strong> speaker was<br />
summonsed for using <strong>of</strong>fensive language, <strong>the</strong> case was dismissed. The scene<br />
occurred outside <strong>the</strong> defendant’s house at around 11.30 at night; police were<br />
at <strong>the</strong> scene.<br />
‘What <strong>the</strong> fuck are youse doing here. My fuckin’ son had to get me out <strong>of</strong> bed. I can’t<br />
believe youse are here. What <strong>the</strong> fuck are youse doing here?’ (to <strong>the</strong> police).<br />
‘I fuckin’ know what this is about. Its about that fuckin’ gas bottle. They can get<br />
fucked, I’m not paying <strong>the</strong>m fucking nothing. They can get me our fuckin’ bottle back’<br />
(to <strong>the</strong> police about <strong>the</strong> neighbours).<br />
‘We never had any fuckin’ trouble till youse fuckin’ moved here. Youse have fuckin’<br />
caused this trouble <strong>and</strong> called <strong>the</strong> fuckin’ police on me’ (to <strong>the</strong> neighbours). (Police v.<br />
Butler (2003) NSWLC 2 before Heilpern J, 14 June 2002)<br />
By <strong>the</strong> MCPC, <strong>the</strong> defendant did use <strong>of</strong>fensive language – why is it not<br />
<strong>of</strong>fensive in law? 7 The judgment in <strong>the</strong> case in question referred to ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />
case, where a defendant was summonsed for saying to <strong>the</strong> police restraining<br />
him during a brawl:<br />
Get fucked you cunts, I’m just trying to help my mates.<br />
That case was dismissed on <strong>the</strong> following basis:<br />
I [Justice Yeldham] determined by a consideration as best I could <strong>of</strong> community<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards today <strong>and</strong> decisions on this kind <strong>of</strong> legislation over <strong>the</strong> last twenty years, that<br />
<strong>the</strong> words were not intrinsically ‘<strong>of</strong>fensive’ in <strong>the</strong> requisite legal sense <strong>of</strong> that word.<br />
In Police v. Butler, Justice Heilpern referred to several similar cases, <strong>and</strong><br />
also to <strong>the</strong> extreme prevalence <strong>of</strong> words like fuck <strong>and</strong> cunt within <strong>the</strong><br />
community, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir frequency on free-to-air television <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r media: 8<br />
Channel 9 has recently broadcast a show (Sex in <strong>the</strong> City) that includes <strong>the</strong> words ‘fuck<br />
<strong>of</strong>f’ <strong>and</strong> ‘fucking’ as well as ‘cunt’. The word was used on ‘The Panel’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> station<br />
only received two complaints. Recently, <strong>the</strong> Sydney Morning Herald revealed that<br />
‘fuck’ was used in <strong>the</strong> television program ‘The Sopranos’ seventy-one times in one<br />
single episode (SMH April 29, 2000, 3s). Big Bro<strong>the</strong>r residents evidently cannot live<br />
without <strong>the</strong> word in every episode.<br />
Justice Heilpern concluded that:<br />
This is a classic example <strong>of</strong> conduct which <strong>of</strong>fends against <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong> good taste<br />
or good manners, which is a breach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rules <strong>of</strong> courtesy <strong>and</strong> runs contrary to