15.11.2012 Views

Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language

Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language

Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bad language? Jargon, slang, swearing <strong>and</strong> insult 65<br />

<strong>the</strong> family member, ‘Can you tell yet whe<strong>the</strong>r he has cancer <strong>and</strong> will he get well?’<br />

(Cassileth <strong>and</strong> Hamilton 1979: 242)<br />

Such obfuscating terminology unfortunately typifies exchanges between medical<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> bewildered public. In this case, it reflects <strong>the</strong><br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional’s difficulty in communicating <strong>the</strong> realities <strong>of</strong> cancer to <strong>the</strong> lay<br />

population.<br />

There are times when bewildering jargon is quite deliberate. The linguistic<br />

disguise <strong>of</strong> criminal jargon conceals <strong>the</strong> disreputable (see <strong>the</strong> discussion <strong>of</strong><br />

antilanguage below). There are Dutch fishermen who reverse syllables, <strong>and</strong> also<br />

sometimes words, to disguise <strong>the</strong>ir speech so that o<strong>the</strong>r fishermen won’t discover<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir secrets. Trade jargons like Romani can work as a secret code to conceal<br />

information from customers or any would-be competitors on <strong>the</strong> outside. 16<br />

Because it is founded on a common interest, <strong>the</strong> most remarkable characteristic<br />

<strong>of</strong> a jargon is (as mentioned) its specialized vocabulary <strong>and</strong> idiom.<br />

While jargons facilitate communication among in-groupers on <strong>the</strong> one h<strong>and</strong>,<br />

on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>y erect communication barriers that keep out-groupers out. It<br />

is, <strong>of</strong> course, out-groupers who find jargon ‘abounding in uncommon or<br />

unfamiliar words’, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore ‘unintelligible or meaningless talk or<br />

writing; gibberish’. 17 If <strong>the</strong> out-grouper is sufficiently rancorous, s/he might<br />

also conclude that <strong>the</strong> jargon is ‘debased, outl<strong>and</strong>ish or barbarous’. 18<br />

The linguistic features found in a jargon can start life with a very clear<br />

function, but over time <strong>the</strong> original motivation becomes obscured <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y<br />

turn into self-perpetuating idiosyncrasies. Legalese avoids pronouns to ensure<br />

clear unambiguous identification, as in The Lessor hereby leases to <strong>the</strong> Lessee<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lessee hereby agrees to take from <strong>the</strong> Lessor <strong>the</strong> property; but, <strong>of</strong><br />

course, <strong>the</strong>re are many occasions where <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a pronoun would be<br />

completely unambiguous. With time, such features become ritual requirements<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional style; mere skeuomorphs. 19<br />

Jargon is a variety <strong>of</strong> language used among people who have a common<br />

work-related or recreational interest. Its principal function is to serve as an ingroup<br />

language that is an essential tool in precise <strong>and</strong> economical communication,<br />

using devices not found in o<strong>the</strong>r varieties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> language. This<br />

primary function <strong>of</strong> jargon is far from dysphemistic to in-groupers. For some<br />

jargons, such as legalese or linguisticalese, <strong>the</strong> in-group is fairly well defined.<br />

For o<strong>the</strong>rs, such as stock-market reports <strong>and</strong> games such as bridge, football<br />

<strong>and</strong> cricket, <strong>the</strong>re is barely an in-group at all, except among pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. For<br />

language dealing with death, birth notices <strong>and</strong> recipes, <strong>the</strong>re is even less <strong>of</strong> a<br />

non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional in-group – though <strong>the</strong>re is a special vocabulary, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are conventional patterns <strong>of</strong> expression for all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se. The facts are clear:<br />

where in-groupers are associated with a particular trade or pr<strong>of</strong>ession, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

constitute a well-defined group (sharing similar educational <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!