Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language
Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language
Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Taboo</strong>s <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir origins 25<br />
And cut your trusters’ throats! Bound servants, steal!<br />
Large-h<strong>and</strong>ed robbers your grave masters are,<br />
And pill by law: Maid, to <strong>the</strong>y master’s bed,<br />
Thy mistress is o’<strong>the</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>l! Son <strong>of</strong> sixteen,<br />
Pluck <strong>the</strong> lin’d crutch from thine old limping sire,<br />
With it beat out his brains!<br />
(Bowdlerized Shakespeare,<br />
Timon <strong>of</strong> A<strong>the</strong>ns, IV.i.4–15)<br />
Unlike most such sanctimonious busybodies, Bowdler was <strong>the</strong> inspiration<br />
for an eponymous neologism, bowdlerize ‘to censor a work <strong>of</strong> art to make a<br />
travesty <strong>of</strong> it’.<br />
To satisfy twenty-first-century ‘sensitivity review guidelines’, <strong>the</strong> New<br />
York State Education Department bowdlerized texts for use in an exam,<br />
supposedly to prevent students feeling ill at ease. Passages were sanitized <strong>of</strong><br />
references to race, religion, ethnicity, sex, nudity, unusual (we dare not write<br />
abnormal) body size, alcohol <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>anity. In an excerpt from <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong><br />
Jewish writer Isaac Bashevis Singer, all mention <strong>of</strong> Judaism was eliminated;<br />
thus a reference to ‘Most Jewish women’ became ‘Most women’, <strong>and</strong> even<br />
<strong>the</strong> tautologous truism ‘Jews are Jews <strong>and</strong> Gentiles are Gentiles’ was deleted.<br />
The phrase ‘even <strong>the</strong> Polish schools were closed’ was altered to ‘even <strong>the</strong><br />
schools were closed’. In a passage from Annie Dillard’s An American Childhood,<br />
whose point is to emphasize <strong>the</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> racial differences,<br />
reference to race was edited out <strong>of</strong> a description <strong>of</strong> her childhood trips to a<br />
library in <strong>the</strong> black section <strong>of</strong> town, which had but few white visitors. Deleted<br />
from a speech by United Nations Secretary General K<strong>of</strong>i Annan was a<br />
reference to <strong>the</strong> United States’ unpaid debt to <strong>the</strong> UN. His praise <strong>of</strong> ‘fine<br />
California wine <strong>and</strong> seafood’ was reduced to praise for merely ‘fine California<br />
seafood’. In Carol Saline’s Mo<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> Daughters, a girl who ‘went out<br />
to a bar’ with her mo<strong>the</strong>r simply ‘went out’ after <strong>the</strong> text was censored. In an<br />
excerpt from Barrio Boy by Ernesto Galarza, a ‘gringo lady’ becomes an<br />
‘American lady’; a boy described as ‘skinny’ became ‘thin’, while a ‘fat’ boy<br />
became ‘heavy’. In a passage from Frank Conroy’s Stop-Time, ‘hell’ was<br />
replaced by ‘heck’ <strong>and</strong> references to sex, religion <strong>and</strong> nudity were excised.<br />
From Anne Lamott’s Bird by Bird, <strong>the</strong> sentence ‘She’s gay!’ was deleted.<br />
According to a New York Times report (2 June 2002) authors, pr<strong>of</strong>essors,<br />
students <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> general public complained. One pr<strong>of</strong>essor wrote: ‘I implore<br />
you to put a stop to <strong>the</strong> sc<strong>and</strong>alous practice <strong>of</strong> censoring literary texts,<br />
ostensibly in <strong>the</strong> interest <strong>of</strong> our students. It is dishonest. It is dangerous. It<br />
is an embarrassment. It is <strong>the</strong> practice <strong>of</strong> fools.’ Someone else commented:<br />
‘The butchery <strong>of</strong> literary texts . . . is a fresh illustration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that<br />
somewhere along <strong>the</strong> way, people got <strong>the</strong> ridiculous notion that <strong>the</strong>y have a<br />
right “not to be <strong>of</strong>fended”. In fact, it should be obvious that such a right, if it