11.07.2015 Views

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

114 Deli Cheng, Yushou Xie, and Zhifeng Ding2. Magnitude ScaleThe Gutenberg surface-wave magnitude formula (Gutenberg, 1945a) and Gutenberg-Richterbody-wave magnitude formula (Gutenberg and Richter, 1956) wereused:Ms = log A + 1.656 log A + 1.818 + S (1)mg = log($)+ Q(A,h) + C.In formula (1): A is <strong>the</strong> vector sum of maximum horizontal displacements in pmof surface waves with period of 20 f 3 sec for earthquakes with epicentral distancebetween 15" and 130" (a factor of 4 is multiplied when only one component isavailable); A is <strong>the</strong> epicentral distance, in degrees; and <strong>the</strong> station correction (S)is taken <strong>from</strong> Gutenberg (1945a). In using formula (l), Gutenberg also considered<strong>the</strong> influence of focal depth, radiation pattern and wave path. He pointed out thatformula (1) was obtained <strong>from</strong> earthquakes with focal depth (h) <strong>from</strong> 20 to 30km; and that for h 5 40 km, <strong>the</strong> correction does not exceed 0.2. Thus, in thispaper, formula (1) is ordinarily used for shallow shocks with h 5 40 km; and for40 < h 5 100 km, a magnitude correction, AMs, according to BZth (1977) is used:h (km) 40 50 60 70 80 90 100AM, +0.15 +0.20 +0.30 +0.35 +0.45 $0.50 +0.55When <strong>the</strong> average value of many stations was used, <strong>the</strong> influence of azimuth andwave path were not considered. Never<strong>the</strong>less, it is necessary to point out thataccording to Gutenberg's investigation, for seismic waves passing through <strong>the</strong> PacificBasin and that outside of it, <strong>the</strong> difference of magnitude may attain 0.5.For <strong>the</strong> years 1900 to 1948, no strict specification could be given for <strong>the</strong> amplitudeA in formula (1). Generally, one half of <strong>the</strong> wave crest-to-trough value of <strong>the</strong> surfacewavemaximum was taken, which is slightly larger than <strong>the</strong> weighted average of<strong>the</strong> three consecutive amplitudes around <strong>the</strong> maximum taken by Gutenberg (Bgth,1981).The body-wave magnitude formula (2) was given by Gutenberg for unified magnitude.The Q-value resulted <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> modification of <strong>the</strong> shallow and deep focusbody-wave magnitude scales (Gutenberg, 194513, 1945c) by using more observationaldata. Thus, <strong>the</strong> rnB-value calculated by using formula (2) differs slightly<strong>from</strong> that given in Gutenberg and Richter (1954), indicated by MB in this paper.The 1945 values of Gutenberg (1945b, 1945c) were used for <strong>the</strong> station correctionC. The maximum amplitude of <strong>the</strong> body wave was taken as amplitude A, usually10 see after <strong>the</strong> first impulse on seismograms of broad-band intermediate-periodseismographs.For earthquakes with focal depth h 5 40 km, both Ms and rng were determined.For 40 < h 5 100 km, rng was usually given and Ms with depth correction wheneverpossible. For medium and deep focus earthquakes, only rng is given.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!