11.07.2015 Views

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SOME REMARKS ON HISTORICAL SEISMOGRAMSAND THE MICROFILMING PROJECTS. Ma'yamuraOki Electric Industry, Ltd.Tokyo, JapanABSTRACTFor <strong>the</strong> selection of earthquakes in <strong>the</strong> seismogram filming project, differentbasic catalogs are compared. In particular, <strong>the</strong> catalogs preparedby World Data Center A (WDC-A) for <strong>the</strong> microfilming project are examined.The geographical inhomogeneity of magnitude threshold is discussed.The importance of selecting rare earthquakes far <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> seismiczones is emphasized. Examples of rare earthquakes in <strong>the</strong> different partsof <strong>the</strong> Earth are shown in tables and maps.Beside magnitude, damage is usually considered for <strong>the</strong> selection ofearthquakes to be filmed. However, unlike magnitude catalogs, we have noaccurate global damage catalog of destructive earthquakes. A provisionallist of destructive earthquakes has been prepared, based on Rika Nenpyo(Science Almanac, Tokyo Astronomical Observatory), Bdth (1979), andseveral regional catalogs.In selecting stations for <strong>the</strong> filming project, it is necessary to adoptseveral stations in <strong>the</strong> same region, so as not to miss seismograms of anysignificant earthquakes. Finaliy, some problems related to <strong>the</strong> name, code,and coordinates of seismological stations are discussed.1. IntroductionFirst, it must be emphasized that <strong>the</strong> seismogram filming project should not beused as justification for: (1) discarding <strong>the</strong> original seismograms that are selectedfor <strong>the</strong> filming; and (2) neglecting to keep seismograms at <strong>the</strong> stations that are notselected for <strong>the</strong> project. Even <strong>the</strong> best copies could not replace <strong>the</strong> original records.Moreover, it is possible that records not selected for <strong>the</strong> filming will be required in<strong>the</strong> future for some unforeseeable scientific or practical needs.Seismograph stations also have to be selected for <strong>the</strong> filming project. However,seismograms at <strong>the</strong> stations not selected sometimes become important. Often, astation of high quality failed to record a certain earthquake, but a less qualifiedstation in <strong>the</strong> same region might succeed in recording it. The information requiredto use <strong>the</strong> seismograms is expected to be furnished with <strong>the</strong> copies. However,providing complete information for each seismogram is not easy in many cases.2. Selection of Earthquakes2.1. Magnitudes in Different CatalogsThe common procedure for selecting earthquakes for <strong>the</strong> seismogram filmingproject is to define significant earthquakes by magnitude and damage. First, westudy <strong>the</strong> discrepancies of magnitudes in <strong>the</strong> different standard catalogs. Guten-Hisrorical <strong>Seismograms</strong>and Earrhquakes of <strong>the</strong> World401 Copyright Z IVW by Academic Press, Inc.All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!