11.07.2015 Views

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174 N. N. Ambraseys and C. F. Finkel26 30 34 38 42Figure 1: Location map of <strong>the</strong> earthquake of 17 August 1668. Place names givenin full are known or assumed sites affected by <strong>the</strong> earthquake (see Appendix 2). Heavybroken lines show <strong>the</strong> location and extent of fault breaks associated with 20th centuryearthquakes in <strong>the</strong> North Anatolian fault zone; solid lines show <strong>the</strong> location and probableextent of faulting associated with <strong>the</strong> earthquake of 1668. Dotted lines show main caravanroutes in <strong>the</strong> seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (Taeschner, 1926; Taeschner, 1960);main staging posts are shown by two letters:Tr = Trabzon Mu = Mus kn = Konya Ky = KayseriEr = Erzurum A1 = Aleppo Ku = Kutahya Va = VanHr = Harput Mo = Mosul Im = Izmit Rh = RhodesDb = Diyarbakir Ak = AntakyaNote <strong>the</strong> bias toward information <strong>from</strong> towns of <strong>the</strong> main caravan routes. Dashed contourshows approximate limits of epicentral area with I = VI (MSK) with rui = 270 km.sequence of events into three distinctly different major earthquakes: one in Kastamonuand Bolu on 18 August, ano<strong>the</strong>r in Konya on 13 September, and he adds athird catastrophic earthquake in Izmir on 10 July 1668, which is, in fact, <strong>the</strong> earthquakeof 1688, one of <strong>the</strong> many erroneous entries in this catalogue. Later cataloguesfollow Sieberg, although different works by o<strong>the</strong>rs are quoted, and <strong>the</strong> details arenot always consistent. Pinar and Lahn (1952) copy Sieberg and Calvi (1941), asecondary source, producing four large earthquakes with epicenters located in differentparts of Turkey. Ergin et al. (1967) merely copies Pinar and Lahn, addingnothing new, and Soysal et al. (1981), more recently, copies all <strong>the</strong> previous secondarysources including Ambraseys (1975), to produce seven distinct earthquakeswith epicenters widely dispersed in Anatolia.The primary (that is, contemporary or near-contemporary) sources at our disposal,show that <strong>the</strong>re was only one major event during <strong>the</strong> period 3 July to 13September 1668, preceded and followed by damaging shocks, <strong>the</strong> main shock occurringon 17 August, and affecting <strong>the</strong> region between Bolu and Ersincan. For <strong>the</strong>limits of <strong>the</strong> epicentral region to <strong>the</strong> west, we have letters written by merchantsin late August and early September 1668 <strong>from</strong> Beypazari and Izmir respectively,confirming that <strong>the</strong> shock felt in <strong>the</strong>se places and in Istanbul occurred during <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!