Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Catalog of Large and Damaging Earthquakes in Japan 161Figure 4. Magnitude vs. cumulative frequency relationship for shallow earthquakes inregion A in the years 1885-1984. Curves G, U, M, and L represent Gutenberg and Richter,Utsu, Makjanik, and Lomnitz-Adler and Lomnitz formulas fitted to the data using themaximum likelihood method, respectively.REFERENCESAbe, K. (1979). Instrumental magnitudes of Japanese earthquakes, 1901-1925, Zisin (J.Seism. SOC. Japan), Ser. 2, 32, 341-354 (in Japanese).Central Meteorological Observatory (1952). The magnitude catalogue of major earthquakeswhich occurred in the vicinity of Japan (1885-1950), Seism. Bull. CMO, for1950, 99-183.Gutenberg, B. and C. F. Richter (1954). Seismicity ofthe Earth and Associated Phenomena,2nd Ed., 310 pp., Princeton University Press.Japan Meteorological Agency (1958). Catalogue of major earthquakes which occurred inand near Japan (1926-1956), Seism. Bull. JMA, Suppl. Vol. 1, 91 pp.Japan Meteorological Agency (1982). Catalog of relocated major earthquakes in and nearJapan (1926-1960), Seism. Bull. JMA, Suppl. Vol. 6, 109 pp.Lomnitz-Adler, J. and C. Lomnitz (1979). A modified form of the Gutenberg-Richtermagnitude-frequency relation, Bull. Seism. SOC. Am., 69, 1209-1214.MakjaniC, B. (1980). On the frequency distribution of earthquake magnitude and intensity,Bull. Seism. SOC. Am., 70, 2253-2260.Utsu, T. (1971). Aftershocks and earthquake statistics (111), J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Uniu.,Ser. VII, 3, 379-441.Utsu, T. (1979). Seismicity of Japan from 1885 through 1925, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst.Univ. Tokyo, 54, 253-308 (in Japanese).Utsu, T, (1980). Spatial and temporal distribution of low-frequency earthquakes in Japan,J. Phys. Earth, 28, 361-384.Utsu, T. (1982). Seismicity of Japan from 1885 through 1925 (correction and supplement),Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Uniu. Tokyo, 57, 111-117 (in Japanese).Utsu, T. (1984). Comparison of four formulas for the distribution of recurrence timesof earthquakes and comparison of five formulas for the distribution of earthquakemagnitudes, Programme and Abstracts, Seism. SOC. Japan, 1984 No. 2, 189 (inJapanese) .