11.07.2015 Views

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

418 S. Miyamuraof <strong>the</strong> seismogram. The records reveal that <strong>from</strong> January 1, 1935, seismographs at<strong>the</strong> new outpost station of Leipzig, Collmberg (CLL), were used for <strong>the</strong> readings, butISS did not change <strong>the</strong> station name (B. Tittel, 1985, personal communication). ISClists Leipzig as LEI and mentions Leipzig Collm as an alternate name of Collmberg,and so <strong>the</strong>re is no ambiguity.In general, station coordinates are found in <strong>the</strong> station directories and stationbulletins. We often find different coordinates for stations with <strong>the</strong> same name.However, <strong>the</strong> difference of coordinates does not necessarily correspond to <strong>the</strong> actualmove of <strong>the</strong> seismometer sites. Sometimes <strong>the</strong> difference is due to printing mistakes,and sometimes it represents <strong>the</strong> move of <strong>the</strong> office building and not <strong>the</strong> seismometersite. The first Bergen station in <strong>the</strong> Bergen Museum prior to 1968 was 300 mnorth of <strong>the</strong> station in Vilari 9 old institute, and was never moved until 1968. However,station bulletins gave a couple of different coordinates, because of inaccuratedeterminations or printing mistakes (M. Sellevoll, 1977, personal communication).4. Concluding RemarksIn this paper I have pointed out many errors in several valuable publications. Ihope it is understood that <strong>the</strong> intention is not to degrade <strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>the</strong>sepublications, but ra<strong>the</strong>r to recommend <strong>the</strong> readers to use <strong>the</strong>m properly.In addition, I am afraid that this paper may include many mistakes due to myignorance and/or carelessness. If <strong>the</strong> readers find any mistakes, please inform medirectly and also publish <strong>the</strong> errors to avoid misleading <strong>the</strong> seismological community.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSI would like to express my sincere gratitude to Drs. W. H. K. Lee, U.S. GeologicalSurvey, and H. Meyers, National Geophysical Data Center, N.O.A.A., who gave me<strong>the</strong> opportunity to cooperate <strong>the</strong> microfilming project of WDC-A and to attendUNESCO/IASPEI workshop, 1983, Hamburg, and IASPEI Symposium No. 14 on<strong>Historical</strong> Earthquakes and <strong>Seismograms</strong>, 1985, Tokyo.REFERENCESAbe, K. (1981). Magnitudes of large shallow earthquakes <strong>from</strong> 1904 to 1980, Phys. EarthPlanet. Interiors, 37, 72-92.Abe, K. (1984). Complements to ‘Magnitudes of large shallow earthquakes <strong>from</strong> 1904 to1980”, Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors, 54, 17-23.Abe, K. and H. Kanamori (1979). Magnitudes of great shallow earthquakes <strong>from</strong> 1953 to1977, Tectonophysics, 63, 191-203.Abe, K. and S. Noguchi (1983a). Determination of magnitude for large shallow earthquakes,1898-1917, Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors, 32, 45-59.Abe, K. and S. Noguchi (1983b). Revision of magnitudes of large shallow earthquakes,1897-1912, Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors, SS, 1-11.Ambraeeys, N. N. and C. P. Melville (1982). A history of Persian earthquales, CambridgeUniv. Press, 219 pp.B%th, M. (1979). Introduction to Seismology, 2nd ed., Birkhiuser Verlag, Basel-Boston-Stuttgart, 428 pp. (cf. p. 139-149)Christoskov, L. V. (1983). Razuitia nu teoretichnite osnoui i prilodzhni aapekti v magnitudnataMasifikatsiya no zemetrecreniyata. Autoreferat nu disertatsiya, BulgarskaAkademiya na Naukite, Sofia, 54 pp. (cf. p. 36).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!