11.07.2015 Views

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Seismograms</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Microfilming Project 403Table 1. Earthquakes in Duda (1965) (DU) with MDU L 7.5, not listed inGutenberg and Richter (1954) (GR) and Abe and Noguchi (1983a, b) (AN, AN’).Year190519071908190919101913191519161917Date03.1810.2105.0412.1212.0905.2208.0102.2802.0102.0612.29Time00:5811 :0106:5112:0823:2306:2517:lO18:5907:3621:5122.50Lat. O27.5 s42.0 N07.5 S14.0 S10.0 s42.0 N47.5 N23.6 N29.5 N48.5 N15.0 NLon. O173.0 W042.0 E153.7 E078.0 W165.0 E145.0 E155.5 E123.5 E131.5 E178.5 E097.0 WDepthss8ss8sssBsMDU7.57.57.77.57.77.78.07.77.7Rem.Remarks: (1) GR: 12:54.9 26.5 N, 97 E, MGR = 7.5 (26N360); MAN = 7.6, MA” =7.0. (2) GR: 23:28.8 12 N, 144.5 E, h = 50 km, MGR = 7.4 (17N780); MAN = 7.1,MAN/ = 6.8. cf. Remark (2) in Table 2.and Meyers, 1981); but in <strong>the</strong> fourth report (Glover and Meyers, 1982), <strong>the</strong> globaland U.S. lists have been combined into one catalog for 1900-1962.The global catalog for 1900-1962 in Meyers and Lee (1979) [hereafter SE22 ] is acomputer-readable version based on <strong>the</strong> earthquake catalog of Rika Nenpyo (ScienceAlmanac) compiled by T. Usami (1975) [hereafter RN]. SE22 stated that RN isbased on Gutenberg (1956) [hereafter G 1, Gutenberg and Richter (1954) [ GR 1, andRothB (1969) [hereafter RO ] for <strong>the</strong> periods 1900-1903, 1904-1952, and 1953-1962,respectively. However, <strong>the</strong> catalog is not so simple. It includes earthquakes withM 2 7.0, and this M is <strong>the</strong> largest value among different sources. Unfortunately,<strong>the</strong> reference sources are not given explicitly. It is clear that <strong>the</strong> earthquakes in andnear Japan prior to 1925 are taken <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> catalog of <strong>the</strong> Central MeteorologicalObservatory (CMO) (1950), because it explains that: (1) M for those earthquakesare converted <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kawasumi intensity magnitude Mk and generally are 0.5units larger than <strong>the</strong> instrumental magnitude by <strong>the</strong> Japan Meteorological Agency(JMA), MJ; and (2) <strong>the</strong> number of earthquakes prior to 1925 is larger than <strong>the</strong>number of earthquakes in <strong>the</strong> later period. Japanese earthquakes after 1926 aretaken <strong>from</strong> JMA data. In addition, damaging earthquakes having M < 7.0 areincluded, but nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> data source nor <strong>the</strong> selection criteria are given.Computer output should be carefully examined visually. SE22 includes <strong>the</strong> followingerrors:(1) “1905 Feb 21 41.5N 142.5W 7.0 North Pacific Ocean” should be“1905 Feb 21 41.5N 142.53 7.0 Hokkaido”,(2) “1906 Mar 16 23.53 120.5E 8.5 Australia” should be“1906 Mar 16 23.5N 120.5E 8.5 Taiwan”, and(3) “1906 Apr 18 38.0s 123.0W 8.25 South Pacific Ocean” should be“1906 Apr 18 38.ON 123.0W 8.25 California”.Similar printing mistakes were found in DV, i.e. “W” should be “E” in <strong>the</strong> followingearthquakes: February 1, 1938; November 10, 1942; May 3, 1943; and November25, 1953.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!