11.07.2015 Views

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Earthquakes and Deep Fracture Zones in Ecuador 367<strong>the</strong> list is supplemented by disastrous earthquakes observed in <strong>the</strong> continental partof sou<strong>the</strong>rn Colombia since 1827 (earthquakes of class I1 and 111 in Ramirez, 1975)to confirm <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn continuation of <strong>the</strong> fracture zone F.The location and shape of fields of maximum macroseismic intensities for individualearthquakes are shown in Figures 4-6, toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> outcrops of <strong>the</strong>seismically active fracture zones. The range of intensities used for <strong>the</strong> constructionof macroseismic fields is given in Table 1; epicenters of disastrous earthquakes insou<strong>the</strong>rn Colombia are also shown with crosses in Figures 4-5. It appears that all<strong>the</strong> disastrous earthquakes of Ecuador are located ei<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> fracture zones of<strong>the</strong> overriding South American plate or in <strong>the</strong> subducted Naaca plate. However,<strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong>se earthquakes (83%) can be related to individual fracture zonesin <strong>the</strong> continental plate, <strong>the</strong> rest being located in <strong>the</strong> subducted Nazca plate. Theassignment of individual earthquakes to <strong>the</strong> respective fracture zone is also given inTable 1.The most disastrous Ecuadorian earthquakes of 1797 and 1949 (Nos. 1 and 9 withI, = 11' MCS in Table 1 and Figures 4-5) occurred at <strong>the</strong> intersection of <strong>the</strong> fracturezones KO, CS and D, with <strong>the</strong>ir macroseismic fields elongated along <strong>the</strong> strike of <strong>the</strong>fracture zone KO (compare also Martelly, 1952). The macroseismic fields of o<strong>the</strong>revents appear also to be elongated along <strong>the</strong> strike of <strong>the</strong> corresponding fracturezones (compare fields of Nos. 1, 9, 14 with KO, Nos. 2, 3, 4, 10 with F, No. 16 withU, and No.18 with CS) or along <strong>the</strong> strike of <strong>the</strong> subduction zone (Nos. 8, 11, 15).r- L1a2 wI180 78 ,i --_I_ ~ -L-I I -1Figure 4. Position and shape of fields of maximum intensities for disastrous earthquakesobserved in Ecuador <strong>from</strong> 1797 to 1923 (Nos. 1-5 in Table 1) in <strong>the</strong> pattern of <strong>the</strong>seismically active fracture zones (Figure 2); epicenters in sou<strong>the</strong>rn Colombia (Nos. 19-22)are denoted by crosses.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!