11.07.2015 Views

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Magnitudes and Origin Times <strong>from</strong> Milne Seismograph Data 474. California EarthquakesEarthquakes listed in Toppozada et al. (1978), Richter (1958) and Coffman andvon Hake (1973) have been surveyed. The results for 21 earthquakes are summarizedin Table 4.Most of <strong>the</strong> Milne stations are distributed far <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> California region, andonly five stations are at distances shorter than 70': Victoria (A - 15"), Toronto(A - 30°), Baltimore (A - 30'), Honolulu (A - 35'), and Trinidad (A - 60').The reports <strong>from</strong> Toronto started in September, 1897, and those <strong>from</strong> Victoriastarted in October, 1898. The data <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two stations are complete for 1899and later years, and are very useful. The reports <strong>from</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r three stations started in1901, and <strong>the</strong>ir reportings are so discontinuous or infrequent that <strong>the</strong> data are onlypartly useful, particularly for large shocks. Owing to such a biased distribution, <strong>the</strong>data for small shocks are insufficient. Magnitudes with a dagger symbol in Table 4indicate that <strong>the</strong>y have been determined <strong>from</strong> only one or two stations.Richter (1958) lists three large shocks with magnitude 6 or 6;: September 20,1907, November 4, 1908 and May 15, 1910. If <strong>the</strong>se magnitudes are correct, <strong>the</strong>shocks are large enough to be recorded at many stations. However, no Milne datahave been reported <strong>from</strong> any stations, not even Victoria and Toronto. In addition,no data have been found for five shocks of magnitude 5.5 listed in Toppozada et al.(1978). Probably <strong>the</strong>se shocks may have smaller magnitudes on <strong>the</strong> instrumentalbasis.Table 4. Magnitudes of Earthquakes in California RegionEVENT YEAR MO DY HR:I" ON ' W MyCAO 1CA02CA03CA04CA05CAOGCA07CA08CA09CAlOCAI1CA12CA13CA14CA15CAl6CA17CA18CA19CA20189818991899189919011902100319031903190619061906190619071908190919091910191019104 157 67 2212 253 37 281 246 118 33 34 184 194 238 118 185 1810 293 113 198 507:06.720:14.520:31.112:24.907:42.3O6:57*05:27.813:13.906:50.720:23.813:12.500:27.709:10.312:19.310:59*01:19*06:48.506:54.200:09.401 :31.2393734.533.53634.631.537.637.33337.732.54140.840.84140.536.94040.8124121.5117.5116.5120.5120.4115.5121.8121.8117122.5115.5124124.2124124124.2121.8125124.25.575.55.54.58.36.05.06.05.56.06.8CA21 1911 7 1 21:59.7 37.3 121.8 6.6 6.5* = Richter (1958) and Toppozada et al. (1978).# = Surface-wave magnitude <strong>from</strong> Milne data.t = Determination <strong>from</strong> only one or two station data.6.7t4.7t5 .6t6.46.45.0t6.65.415.3t5.3t7.86.26.45.0t4.9t4.9t5 .a5.86.06.6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!