11.07.2015 Views

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

Historical Seismograms - Evidence from the AD 2000 Izu Islands ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EVALUATION OF DAMAGE AND SOURCE PARAMETERSOF THE MALAGA EARTHQUAKE OF 9 OCTOBER 1680D. Murioz and A. UdiasCa'tedra de GeofisicaUniversidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, SpainABSTRACTOn <strong>the</strong> 9th of October 1680, an earthquake caused widespread destructionin <strong>the</strong> city of MBlaga and surrounding region in south Spain.A comprehensive search for contemporary documentation was made and<strong>the</strong> information used for a detailed analysis of <strong>the</strong> damage and characteristicsof this earthquake. Intensities were evaluated at 38 localities and anisoseismal map has been drawn. Maximum intensity reached VIII-IX in<strong>the</strong> MSK scale and covers an area of approximately 20 km radius toward<strong>the</strong> west of MBlaga. Damage in <strong>the</strong> city of MQlaga has been studied in fulldetail, where about 20% of <strong>the</strong> buildings were totally destroyed and 60%suffered heavy damage, half of <strong>the</strong>m had to be abandoned. Low quality ofconstruction contributed to <strong>the</strong> damage. Total number of casualties wasnot high, approximately 60 dead and 150 injured. Radius of perceptibilitywas fairly large, <strong>the</strong> shock was felt in Madrid 400 km away with intensityIV. Intensity attenuation and focal parameters have been derived <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong>intensity distribution. This study shows that contemporary documentsmust be studied with care in <strong>the</strong>ir historical and cultural background toavoid overrating in <strong>the</strong> evaluation of intensities.1. IntroductionOn <strong>the</strong> 9th of October 1680, an earthquake occurred in sou<strong>the</strong>rn Spain producingheavy damage to <strong>the</strong> city of Mdaga and nearby towns and villages. This shock,one of <strong>the</strong> most important to occur in sou<strong>the</strong>rn Spain since 1500, is listed in allSpanish catalogues (concerning catalogues of earthquakes in Spain, see Muiioz andUdias, 1982). However, oldest catalogues show some confusion regarding <strong>the</strong> date.Zahn (1696) and Moreira de Mendonsa (1758) date it in November, while Perrey(1847) and Mallet (1858) list three events in September 1679, August and October1680, which are obviously <strong>the</strong> same shock. In <strong>the</strong> recent catalogues, maximumintensity assigned to this shock is: Milne (1912) I1 (Milne scale), SAnchez Navarro-Neumann (1920) X (Forel-Mercalli scale), Munuera (1963) VIII (Mercalli scale) andIX (Fore1 Scale). The modern catalogue (Mezcua and Martinez Solares, 1983) gives<strong>the</strong> following entry: 9 October 1680, 7h, 4' 24' W, 36' 30' N, I = IX (MSK scale),south of MQlaga. The epicenter is located offshore, but as will be shown, <strong>the</strong>re isnot sufficient evidence for this.To understand <strong>the</strong> importance of this earthquake and <strong>the</strong> information containedin <strong>the</strong> contemporary documents, <strong>the</strong> historical and demographic situation of Spainand in particular of Andalucia must be taken into account (Ambraseys et al., 1984).The year of <strong>the</strong> earthquake, 1680, corresponds to <strong>the</strong> reign of Carlos I1 (1661-1700)who occupied <strong>the</strong> throne of Spain after <strong>the</strong> death of his fa<strong>the</strong>r Felipe IV in 1665.<strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Seismograms</strong>and Earthquakes of <strong>the</strong> World208Copyright 5 198h by Academic Press, Inc.All rights of reproduction in any form resened.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!